What Bible is GQ Magazine Reading?

By David Marshall Published on April 26, 2018

GQ Magazine stirred up a hornet’s nest by publishing a list of 21 famous books its contributors think “you don’t have to read.” Some of their suggestions make sense to me (weirdly enough, I think kids could survive high school without reading Slaughterhouse Five, Catcher in the Rye, or Catch 22). Others are dubious (we have enjoyed David McCullough, if they have not). Still others are bizarre (you won’t pry The Lord of the Rings out of MY hands, not even when they’re cold and dead, thank you very much!).

Number 12: The Bible

But the real point of the trolls at GQ, and most of the reaction, came in regard to their choice of the Christian Bible as the twelfth book one need not read. Here the trollery, not to mention vulgarity, rises almost to an art form, in the words of a writer named Jesse Ball:  

The Holy Bible is rated very highly by all the people who supposedly live by it but who in actuality have not read it. Those who have read it know there are some good parts, but overall it is certainly not the finest thing that man has ever produced. It is repetitive, self-contradictory, sententious, foolish and even at times ill-intentioned. If the thing you heard was good about the Bible was the nasty bits, then I propose Agota Kristof’s The Notebook, a marvelous tale of two brothers who have to get along when things get rough. The subtlety and cruelty of this story is like that famous sword stroke (from below the boat) that plunged upward through the bowels, the lungs, and the throat and into the brain of the rower. 

The worst of this is no doubt Ball’s tripping over his pretentious tongue to praise some obscure modern novel in place of the Bible. But the heated replies I keep hearing — “3.9 billion Bibles have been read in the past 50 years!” “Let’s see you mock the Koran like that and get away with it!” — have missed the point.  

A World Literature Teacher Responds

Let me respond not as a Christian, but as a teacher of World Literature, presently compiling a World Lit textbook. Let me hit Mr. Ball and GQ Magazine where I think it will hurt most: their impoverished hack literary consciousness.  

As a man who reads like some people lie, in several languages and many literatures, I consider the Bible the most amazing piece of writing human beings have ever set between two covers.  

The Creation story is a wonder. I’ve been looking for interesting tales of cosmic origins to include in my anthology, like maybe a sutra from the Rig Veda. None of it can compete with the sheer genius of the Genesis narration. Man and woman “shall leave father and mother, and the two shall become one flesh,” it says. In just a few words it refutes all those anti-women ancient texts, and anti-man modern texts — from Aristotle to Schopenhauer to De Beauvoir to Friedan — that wish to divide (or subdivide or ignore) the sexes and start a war between us. And it did so before any of these lunatics were born. In a dozen ways, the Genesis story subverts all the blame games society plays to this day. 

The stories of Abraham and Isaac are marvelous and full of hidden meanings. There is the thwarted sacrifice of Isaac on a hill that may have been Golgotha. There is God’s promise then to bless all nations of the world through his descendants. That promise is still being realized in the Jewish race, which wins so many Nobel Prizes for life-enhancing science. Even more it’s fulfilled through Jesus, who has vastly improved life in this world for billions of people, non-Christians included. 

Exodus still roots us to our seats in the theater. The Notebook is supposed to compete with Charlton Heston descending Mt. Sinai with the Ten Commandments in his hands, fire on his head, and smoke in his eyes? Poor fellow.  

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

Still deeper levels move in and through the stories of Samson and Delilah, David and Jonathan or David and Bathsheba. The grand metanarrative of Israel’s great struggle with God and her neighbors continues beyond all odds to this day. It unites the Old Testament in a way I do not find with the great literature of ancient India or China (much as I love both). Yet for Christians it remains but a superficial reading, above which rise still higher levels. Passover lambs, twelve pillars sprinkled with blood, promises to clothe humanity again with God’s sacrificial forgiveness and grace — in all of these the enigmatic title “Messiah” begins to be dropped.  

I want to give my students at least a glimpse of the Wisdom Literature of ancient Israel. But it’s beastly difficult to know what parts of it to choose. G. K. Chesterton read Job as perhaps the greatest poem in the ancient world (and far superior to most modern literature). “All human skeptics routed by a higher skepticism,” he wrote. He spoke of a God who riddles and debates, who “knocks down pessimists and optimists with the same hammer.” Of the climax, Chesterton writes, “Nothing could be better, artistically speaking, than this optimism breaking though agnosticism like fiery gold round the edges of a black cloud.”  

As a man who reads like some people lie, in several languages and many literatures, I consider the Bible the most amazing piece of writing human beings have ever set between two covers.

But I can only offer my students two or three Psalms, which always seem so much more profound than the songs we substitute for them in Church. I do have my students read the glorious Song of Solomon. “Arise, my love, my beauty, and come away. For the winter is past and the rains are gone… ” Pete Seeger made a pop hit of some of the weaker lines in Ecclesiastes (“To everything there is a season… “). George Orwell held other such lines up as a model of the vivid language free of cant that writers should strive to achieve.  

Then we come to the prophets, which contain much of the most glorious language in all literature. Even a Stalinist like Evgeniy Vuchetich could break off a few lines, carve out a statue, and set it in front of the United Nations. The quote perfectly expresses the ideals the prophets have infused upon the modern world. “And He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.” 

I could sample from the Sermon on the Mount, which inspired Tolstoy and King and Gandhi and many others to change the world. I could speak of Paul’s Hymn to Love, which was set to music in Taiwan and sung on Chinese pop stations when I lived there. But time does not permit; I must move on — the best part of the story still beckons. 

The Greatest Story Ever Told

Skeptics eagerly search the ancient world for ancient New Testament scholars for parallels to Jesus. The search has proven a complete bust. They’ve found nothing, as I showed in my last book, and also in a brief article here. “No man has spoken as this man,” the crowd around Jesus said. The great Lin Yutang knew well the writings of Confucius, Lao Zi and Buddha. He considered Zhuang Zi the greatest prose writer in Chinese history. But when he encountered Jesus he said, “Blow out the candles! The sun has risen!”  

If it were only about His grand teachings the story would shine. But that is far from all. It is the way Jesus’ words and story unify the grand sweep of the Bible — in fact all of world literature — that makes this “the greatest story ever told.”  

Ball and his allies at GQ Magazine are fools of a special kind, more to be pitied than scolded, perhaps. Like the obsessed prince of Denmark, they seem “bound in a nutshell” while counting themselves “kings of infinite space.” But Jesus knocks on that door of that shell. Mr. Ball need not stay inside his sadly narrowed vision of what counts as real literature, or real life.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Paul

    I never realized so many Christian authors read GQ.

    • Ken Abbott

      Not the magazine per se, but the several items about the GQ article that have been posted on Internet news and discussion sites. Those of us with a love for the classics of Western literature have been riled up by more than just the magazine’s editors’ diss (and associated rank ignorance) of the Bible.

  • GLT

    As for the question, what Bible did the writers at GQ read? I think the answer is that which applies to a great many critics of the Bible, they have never actually read any Bible outside of those portions posted on atheist websites out of context and with the sole intent to discredit it.

  • Estelline

    Beautifully said–thank you!

  • Ken Abbott

    Whatever “Bible” Jesse Ball is reading, he’s not reading it enough or with sufficient understanding and discernment. But lest we forget, “the man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them because they are spiritually discerned.” In the same way, we who are born again of this same Spirit “have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us.” [Both citations from 1 Corinthians 2] Resolve to pray for Jesse Ball that God’s Spirit may have the same mercy on him as He has had on us who belong to Christ.

  • Vincent J.

    The author references “… twelve pillars sprinkled with blood …” That one lost me. I can’t remember having read that in the bible. Can anyone give me chapter and verse?

    • Ken Abbott

      Exodus 24. Some commentators believe that when Moses sprinkled the blood on “the people” that the blood was actually sprinkled on twelve stone pillars meant to represent the people.

      • Vincent J.

        So it’s not really in the bible. It’s really in the minds of some commentators. OK, I understand now.

        • Ken Abbott

          Depends on whether you think the text supports such an interpretation. To phrase it as “it’s not really in the Bible…it’s really in the minds of some commentators” suggests you think the commentators are making stuff up out of whole cloth, which is at least uncharitable.

          • Vincent J.

            No, I’m not suggesting anybody made something up from whole cloth. On the other hand, to say that the text suggests one thing or another is an admission that it’s in the mind of the reader rather than being explicit in the text.

          • Ken Abbott

            Implicit meanings can be legitimate, although we must use the explicit teachings of Scripture to clarify what is implicit. Implicit readings should always be subordinate to explicit statements.

          • Vincent J.

            Implicit meanings are certainly valid, however I’ve found over the years that people infer meanings which are not valid. I don’t say something is in scripture, if it’s only implicit. I say that it’s something which I have inferred from scripture. If we were more careful about understanding scripture, we wouldn’t have ten thousand different denominations. On the other hand, God says that He gives ears to hear and eyes to see, so probably the most important road to understanding lies in praying and asking God to open the scriptures.

          • Ken Abbott

            And in that we most certainly agree.

Inspiration
The Tiniest Casket
Jennifer Hartline
More from The Stream
Connect with Us