Like The Gulag Archipelago, the Planned Parenthood Videos Show Us the Victims of a Utopian Dream

By Jason Jones & John Zmirak Published on August 19, 2015

Millions of highly-educated Americans still defend Planned Parenthood. Forty years ago, the same kind of people defended Communism. They might have regretted its excesses, and cringed at some of its methods, but its astronomically high ideals inspired them, especially next to the gritty reality of free competition under law.

The Bolsheviks in Russia, then Mao’s cadres in China, and Castro’s in Cuba, were striving to free men of 10,000 years of historical baggage, to rip up the structures of exploitation that had encrusted us over the centuries, to tear out selfishness from its root in the human heart and replace the squabbling, grasping consumers in the marketplace with a stark and ascetical species: Socialist Man. The Party would use its absolute power for good, and not for evil. It would fill the earth with mandatory Franciscans, men and women forged in the blast furnace of struggle until they were happily poor, proudly chaste and perfectly obedient. They would dwell in the happy paradise that Marx had sketched out for them, free of shortage and strife, dabbling at work in the morning, then writing poetry or hunting as the sun went down. There are colorful icons depicting this heaven on earth which Stalin commissioned, in the style he named “Socialist Realism.”

Like Marx and Lenin, Margaret Sanger had a dream. She had grown up in a large family, and seen her mother die shortly after childbirth. Sanger chafed at the grim, biological fact that the ecstasy of sex was chained to pregnancy, to medical risk and physical pain, to squalling brats and stinking diapers. Why should the best, most exciting moments in life be yoked by a pulsing, pink umbilical cord to years of sacrifice and self-denial? Just as Marx looked at how men interact economically and saw a dark conspiracy, Sanger stared at the facts of mammalian reproduction, and found them a crime against women. An unplanned pregnancy was a biological injustice, and this “Woman Rebel” (the title of Sanger’s first magazine) would lead a revolution to correct it.

Revolutions have victims, of course. It takes some heavy lifting to build utopia on earth. As Lenin said, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. “Some of them even fertilized,” Sanger might add with a snicker, from her seat beside him in Hell.

The Western Left lived for decades in denial of Communism’s victims. Just as neo-Nazis today seek to deny, minimize or explain away the Holocaust, Marxists throughout the world colluded with Soviet propaganda to hide the brutalities of the Soviet regime, its savage abuses of power that began in 1917 and continued (sometimes worsening, sometimes abating) until its collapse in 1990.

For every truth-teller like Malcolm Muggeridge and Robert Conquest, there were at least a hundred wistful Western Marxists to wave away the reports of Bolshevik murder squads shooting priests; stealing land from Ukrainian peasants and leaving them to starve by the millions; hammering on doors at 3 a.m. to arrest innocent citizens in the tens of millions, and haul them off to freeze or be worked to death in the icy camps of the Gulag. It’s impressive, really, when you think about it — the largely successful effort by partisans of Marx to hide one of the greatest crime waves in history. According to democide scholar R.J. Rummel, the Soviet regime murdered some 62 million people. And yet for decades, Western Marxists were able to sweep those people’s ashes under the rug.

Until Solzhenitsyn.

A courageous veteran of the World War II Red Army and once a believing Marxist, Alexander Solzhenitsyn was sent to a Gulag camp for penning a letter that cracked a joke about Stalin. For years he worked, and froze, and nearly starved in those sub-Arctic camps. It was in them that he found God and first learned to pray. But he also learned something else: That most of the “convicts” (zeks) who languished there were innocent like him. They weren’t “saboteurs,” “wreckers,” or Nazi spies, as his schools and the Party newspapers had drilled him into thinking. They were ordinary people, who had tried to lead regular lives, and thus run afoul of a system that denied human nature in service of a fantasy. A daydream, really: Marx’s irresponsible musings about the shape of a perfect future, the kind of rot that nowadays might appear at the Daily Kos.

But this wish-fulfillment fantasy had captured the brains of intellectuals, and helped them to channel their characteristic emotions — hubris, envy and impotent rage. Then the Dream got control of a country, of hundreds of millions of flesh and blood experimental subjects whom those intellectuals could run through their mazes, could shock or starve, then kill.

Solzhenitsyn met the victims of the Dream, and asked them to tell their stories. He scrawled their accounts of cruelty, courage, and conversion on tiny scraps of paper, and hid them wherever he could. When he was finally released, he smuggled them out of prison, and spent long years collecting and editing those narratives. He wove them together into a literary and historical masterpiece, The Gulag Archipelago, which he spirited into the West, where it was published in 1973. The nattily tailored Communists of Paris and London scoffed at the book as CIA propaganda, or furiously denounced him. But the truth was out. Each day, it seemed, another longtime Communist would come out and admit that he’d read the book, and was resigning from the Party. The Soviet Union’s foreign legion of collaborators began to melt away and defect. The first cracks appeared in the Berlin Wall — down at its foundations, in the minds of intellectuals. They saw at last the faces of the victims, and began to doubt the Dream.

The newest video from the Center for Medical Progress is not a literary masterpiece, but surely Solzhenitsyn is smiling. Men like David Daleiden are carrying on his mission, driven by the same love for concrete, individual human beings who were made in the image of God. Abortion in America has not racked up as many victims as Communism did in Russia: We have killed 57,762,169 as of January, 2015. So we are still some 4 million short of the Soviet total. And Margaret Sanger cannot take sole blame for the death toll, any more than Marx or Lenin can. Each could claim many thousands of accomplices.

But it is Sanger’s dream of absolute, unfettered sexual indulgence that keeps the butchers in business. Marx and Lenin knew that you cannot build socialism unless you are willing to kill and imprison people who cling to their freedom and private property. And Sanger knew that if you were absolutely determined to cut the link between orgasm and childbirth, you would need to use a scalpel. When we look at the tiny face of the baby whom we see dead in the latest CMP video, we need to realize that Sanger could picture it just as well. Like Marx, she knew that her dream would come at a price. She thought it was worth it. As she wrote in 1922, in Woman and the New Race, “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”


Warning: The latest video released by the Center for Medical Progress contains graphic and disturbing testimony and imagery.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Martin Walsh

    We really ought to re-label the abortionists and their supporters. They are not Pro-Choice – they are Pro-Death.

  • haggis95

    Thanks for this article: One day the pro-aborts will be seen in the same light as holocaust deniers.

  • Anon.

    My wife left the (Irish) Workers Party the week she finished reading “Gulag”. We met soon afterwards. The purpose of the Western European Left is to ameleariate the excesses of unbridaled capitalism. Small far-left input into this can be a help… ‘Like’ it depends on who is on the ballot – and who is electable. Pure capitalism does not exist anywhere and is best tempered to aid the vulnerable… the rich do not need preferential treatment. Reform NOT Revolution. To be ‘Pro-Life’ is the only sense there is.

  • Spiritual Ronin

    I often wonder how many of today’s “social justice warriors” would, under the right circumstances, end up as commandants and guards in re-education camps… Progressivism has killed many more millions of people than all of the “reactionary” movements combined.

  • Joe Izquierda

    I think Gulag, Animal Farm, and 1984 should be required reading as well as A Modest Proposal.

  • Anon.

    Also…. Soviet tyrany ended in 1985 with Gorbechev. The elections in 1987 placed the ‘Party’ under the control of the electorate. Soviet democracy involved the electorate changing the (‘one’) Party to its liking rather than swiitching the party in power for another as in the model of Western democracy.

    Also… I visited the USSR in 1980 (tourist NOT fellow-traveller I asure you). We met some people in the street, not on the itenerary. Went back to their place – bought a little hashish 🙂 – told them of Our Lady of Fatima and (briefly) taught them the Rosary – to their mild amusement! Natasha was reading ‘Gulag’ in an english language edition. She constantly impressed on us that it was all true. In the past she said the authorities would shoot people. “Would you like to leave the USSR (to be ‘free’),” we asked? “We can live here,” they replied.

    The USA has more people in prison than Stalin ever had!

    • Liz Litts

      I was going to say something but I don’t waste time on deluded buttheads.

      • Anon.

        The Workers Party once had 7 seats in Dail Eireann – supported a Fianna Fail minority government – toppoled this government over a plan to axe subbsidies on childrens footwear!

        LEP Travel was an Irish travel company – lefties fundraising for WP election funds and the like – and Intourist was the USSR (and other Eastern Europe countries) contact. 100 roubles for brand new Lee Coupers… and so on…

        Glasnost meant, not simply ‘free speach’, but free debate both in the Party and in society. In the 1987 elkections 2500 deputies were freely elected to the Congress of Peoples Deputies which then elected 500 members to the Supreme Soviet. 1800 deputies were directly elected – one man/.woman one vote. 1/4 of constituencies had only one (CP) canditate but the voters had the right to vote down this canditate if they did not approve his position on the reform process. Similarly if there was more than one canditate the voters chose similarly. 15% of candidates were non-party and 20% of elected deputies were. Non-Party candidates got on the ballot by a petition of electors in the given constituency. The other 700 approx. deputies, while technically CP, were appointed by a variety of Soviet societies ( 70 or so by the Soviet Academy of Sciences – one fron the Soviet Stamp Colecters). The votes of these deputies were as free as any other deputies.

        All this was reported in the mainstream Irish media at the time…..

  • Anon.


I Wasn’t the Best Choice for a Husband
Mark Davis Pickup
More from The Stream
Connect with Us