If Hillary Wins: Solzhenitsyn’s Action Plan for Resistance

We must resolve to "live not by lies."

By Jason Jones & John Zmirak Published on June 27, 2016

The State of California, that vast and horrible laboratory for leftist social experiments, is infusing another toxin into the feed of its long-suffering citizens. The same state which has removed the words “husband” and “wife” from all state laws, legalized euthanasia for the handicapped, and sent its Attorney General to kick down the doors of pro-life investigative reporters, now is trying to strip run-of-the-mill federal aid from any college that hews to Christian morality — for instance, by prohibiting extramarital sex on campus, or refusing to hire practicing homosexuals.

The goal is to bully such schools into choosing between vital Title IX funding which almost every college receives, and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Soon it may be fiscally impossible to run a faithful Christian college anywhere in California. The same leftists who back this bill insist that it is “un-American” to worry about how many new radical mosques are popping up there, flush with recent immigrants whose creed includes sharia.

What is happening in California will happen nationwide if Hillary Clinton is elected. We have already seen how aggressive and shameless the Obama administration was willing to be with its diktat on “transgender” bathrooms, and high-handed grant of executive “amnesty” to illegal aliens. We heard Obama’s solicitor general tell the Supreme Court that churches which oppose same-sex marriage ought to lose their tax exemptions (and hence, go broke). If that’s how a lame-duck Democrat acts in his last year in office facing a wholly Republican Congress and a closely divided Supreme Court, just imagine what a cocky Hillary Clinton would get away with in her first 100 days. Think about how the radicals she will appoint to the courts will be ruling 20 or 30 years from now — plucking crucial issues out of the reach of voters, including your children and grandchildren.

But you needn’t tax your imagination: Just look at California. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a Birkenstock, crushing a human face, forever.

Those are the stakes in the upcoming election. Will an unhinged, dogmatic ideology gain control of a vast and diverse country? We have seen that happen before.

From Dialectical Materialism to Multicultural Hedonism

Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s “Live Not By Lies” is a call he issued to his fellow citizens in the USSR in 1974 — and he was promptly arrested by the Soviet secret police for writing it. It tells the truth that millions knew but feared to say: that they lived in the belly of a hungry beast, which had already consumed some 60 million lives in famine and purge and prison camp — all in service of a fantasy: Marx’s this-worldly socialist utopia, which promised: Help us attain absolute power via violent revolution, and we will make a new society where work will feel like play and no one will ever be selfish.

Yet millions of intellectuals around the world bought into this confidence game, and sacrificed their integrity to repeat its comforting lies. The Soviet people learned by bitter, grinding experience the price of trying to shatter human nature, and reconstruct the new “Socialist Man” from the pile of broken pieces.

We are now learning in America the cost imposed by the fantasies that are dominant in our day, which assert against all evidence, argument, and experience that:

  • Western culture has no distinctive value or universal insights that we have any reason to defend against its enemies.
  • Every world culture must be viewed through a single lens (of Western origin): the Machiavellian struggle for power.
  • The earth’s climate is changing not because that’s what it has always done, but because consumerist Westerners are poisoning the atmosphere. To save the planet, we must hand control over our economies to international agencies that will redistribute the wealth.
  • Sex is harmless, cost-free fun, and need have no emotional, psychological, or biological consequences.
  • Human life is not unique, sacred, and good, but sits on the same spectrum as lion life and gorilla life, and sometimes we must end life if it gets in the way of our choices.
  • Marriage is a temporary sex contract between two consenting adults, of no importance to the well-being of children.
  • All religions are equally true or false, and essentially interchangeable in their impacts on society.
  • No one ever really needs to grow up and be responsible for his actions; it’s the state’s job to protect us from ourselves, and our job to work for the benefit of the state.
  • The purpose of life is compiling as many happy moments as possible before a painless “death with dignity.”

These statements sum up the dominant ideology of our society, which isn’t Dialectical Materialism, but Multicultural Hedonism. The most powerful people in our country — from media outlets to universities, from the Clinton campaign to the staff at many seminaries — cling to this creed with the same white-knuckled certitude that sent the Bolsheviks into churches to smash the icons and onto farms to steal all the grain. And elites are increasingly brazen in punishing those who dare to dissent.

How Dissenters Get Punished Today

When faculty members openly refuse to consider hiring Christians; when colleges silence conservative speakers or newspapers and transform campuses into “safe spaces” for groupthink; when social media censor political arguments  — Multicultural Hedonism is the hungry beast which they feed. It is every bit as monolithic as Marxism ever was, though it doesn’t yet have the full coercive power of the central state behind it. Instead of a sudden coup d’etat such as Lenin pulled off in 1917, the Multicultural Hedonists are gaining the power piecemeal to bully and silence their enemies via a long march through the institutions of our society.

Already, opinions that were mainstream eight years ago are considered virtual hate speech. Imagine if someone had confronted Hillary Clinton in 2008 with the charge:

If your agenda prevails, within less than ten years, not only will homosexual marriage be legal, but Christians who oppose it will be persecuted by government agencies, and blamed for violent attacks by anti-Christian Muslims against homosexuals. You will use Muslim assaults on gays to take Constitutional gun rights away from peaceful Christians.

She would have waved him off as a crazy, and everyone would have giggled as security led him out. And yet he would have been right — as right as Soviet dissidents were about that system, which rewarded their truth-telling with long terms in psychiatric hospitals. Solzhenitsyn knew the consequences that his fellow citizens could face for speaking out; he had spent a decade freezing and sometimes starving in a Siberian prison camp for writing a letter that tweaked Stalin’s mustache.

Today, an academic who defends Catholic teaching on marriage at a Catholic university can destroy his own career. So can a bisexual intellectual who questions the wisdom of legalizing same sex marriage; or a doctor who won’t perform useless, destructive transgender surgery on a poor, deluded patient; or a TV sports commentator who doesn’t think that teenage girls should share locker rooms with horny boys who claim to be transgender.

The list of dissidents whom the Multicultural Hedonists have sent to our own Siberia grows longer with each news cycle. Already academics and writers are frightened to speak their minds. You needn’t have actual prison camps to enforce this kind of silence; in Communist Czechoslovakia after the Russian tanks arrived in 1968, most dissenters were not imprisoned, but simply ruined: Milan Kundera was banned from teaching and reduced to washing windows. Such a prospect will silence most people, all but the Solzhenitsyns among us.

Each new crop of college students that enters our universities faces a longer list of questions that are “settled,” where no debate is permitted and disagreement will be punished. The walls are closing in on us, as the air is sucked out of the room.

The Solzhenitsyn Resistance Plan

But Solzhenitsyn’s example teaches us to shun collaboration or despair. Even in the depths of the Soviet dictatorship, there was room for human choices. As Solzhenitsyn explained to his fellow citizens, they might not be able to form a free political party, or publish an honest newspaper. There was just one choice he knew was possible, because he had made it himself: They could choose not to live by lies.

Solzhenitsyn’s program is simple, stark, and challenging. He asks each citizen to dig in his heels and decide, no matter the consequences, that he

  • Will not henceforth write, sign, or print in any way a single phrase which in his opinion distorts the truth.
  • Will utter such a phrase neither in private conversation nor in the presence of many people, neither on his own behalf nor at the prompting of someone else, either in the role of agitator, teacher, educator, not in a theatrical role.
  • Will not depict, foster or broadcast a single idea which he can only see is false or a distortion of the truth whether it be in painting, sculpture, photography, technical science, or music.
  • Will not cite approvingly, either orally or written, a single quotation so as to please someone, to feather his own nest, to achieve success in his work, if he does not share completely the idea which is quoted, or if it does not accurately reflect the matter at issue.
  • Will not allow himself to be compelled to attend demonstrations or meetings if they are contrary to his desire or will, will neither take into hand nor raise into the air a poster or slogan which he does not completely accept.
  • Will not raise his hand to vote for a proposal with which he does not sincerely sympathize, will vote neither openly nor secretly for a person whom he considers unworthy or of doubtful abilities.
  • Will not allow himself to be dragged to a meeting where there can be expected a forced or distorted discussion of a question. Will immediately walk out of a meeting, session, lecture, performance or film showing if he hears a speaker tell lies, or purvey ideological nonsense or shameless propaganda.
  • Will not subscribe to or buy a newspaper or magazine in which information is distorted and primary facts are concealed.

It’s chilling how immediately practical and professionally dangerous this program sounds in today’s America — given that it was written for Brezhnev’s Russia. But it’s also bracing and hopeful: This program helped topple a vast Leviathan of lies. We must arm ourselves with it, in the spirit of David facing down the giant.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Ken Abbott

    There goes my WaPo subscription…and it’s going to be very hard to find any suitable films under these guidelines.

    • Michael Gore

      A vast majority of mankind has survived without the Washington Post and watching movies… somehow you will pull through!

      • Ken Abbott

        Yes, somehow I think I will. I think the publisher and editors of the WaPo would be greatly disconcerted, though, to meditate on their essential unnecessariness.

  • Charles Burge

    We should definitely do what we can to oppose the degradation of our rights, but I think the doom-and-gloom predictions concerning Christian colleges are a bit over the top. Jesus promised (in Matthew chapter 6, among other places) that He will always provide for our needs, as long as we seek the Kingdom first. Yes, college administrators may need to get creative when finding funding, but I believe that those who stay true to the Gospel will always have enough money to do what God intends for them to do.

    • Kaleb VonBerg

      I understand what you’re saying about Christian colleges finding alternative financial means to continue operating, but I think the bigger issue is not that their federal funding may be cut off, but that they eventually may not even be able to exist. It appears the ideology espoused by Christian colleges, the same ideology which is resulting in the California Title IX ruling discussed in the article, may soon be deemed so unacceptable that it can no longer be disseminated. While this potentially seems like a long shot, it is increasingly becoming more likely given we now have governments dictating who companies must do business with regardless of the ideological beliefs of the company owners.

    • Jim

      Perhaps another way to put it is that, while Christian colleges may succeed with the Lord’s help and provision, they may not succeed in the form to which we are accustomed. e.g. at least certain aspects of a Christian college may have to go underground. Those who want such degrees may have to settle for degrees that are not certified by accrediting bodies. Graduates may find that their degrees are not of much value in the marketplace. Faculty may have to ‘make tents’ so as to support themselves while they teach. Schools may have to sell their property and meet more often in churches or other public forums (parks, private property) or in rented properties.

      I.e. think Finkenwalde.

    • Nicole Muir

      Right on, Sister!

  • Puddleglumm

    Good article and much food for thought! And to think one of my favorite bands, the Beach Boys came from California. So much for “California Girls.” One of my other faves, the Beatles were right, it’s more like “Back in the U.S.S.R.”

  • Gail Finke

    The only thing I would change is this”… You will use Muslim assaults on gays to take Constitutional gun rights away from peaceful Christians” to ” You will use Muslim assaults on gays to take Constitutional gun rights away from EVERYONE.”

Inspiration
I Wasn’t the Best Choice for a Husband
Mark Davis Pickup
More from The Stream
Connect with Us