Archbishop Cupich’s Seamless Bulletproof Vest for Pro-Choice Politicians

An Open Letter to the Archbishop of Chicago on Planned Parenthood and Poverty

By Jason Scott Jones Published on August 14, 2015

Your Excellency:

Like millions of Americans who watched the Planned Parenthood videos, I saw there the ultimate evil: Well-educated, prosperous adults calmly sorting through the butchered children of the poor to cherry pick them for profit. But because of my personal history, I saw something special there. In the midst of those scattered limbs and extracted organs, I saw my daughter.

Jessica was aborted against my wishes. And against her mother’s. Though we were both in high school, we were committed to caring for our baby. I had dropped out of school and joined the U.S. Infantry so that I could support my child. But while I was off at basic training, my girlfriend’s father uncovered our plan, and coerced her into a third trimester abortion. Our child died just a few short weeks before she would have been born an American citizen with the protection of all our laws.

She was killed at the Masonic hospital in your city of Chicago, during the tenure of one of your predecessors Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. Her father was a friend of the Cardinal’s, and a prominent Chicago Catholic. For years after that, I harbored a potent grudge against Catholics and the Church, whose prelates, politicos and parents I associated with abortion.

It might sound irrational to you, but I blamed Cardinal Bernardin. Not him alone, of course. Jessica’s death had many fathers. However, as Chicago’s spiritual father, wearing for that city the mantle of the apostles, Cardinal Bernardin bore unique responsibility for witnessing in public to the sanctity of life. As you do now.

Christ came to give us life more abundantly, but in Cardinal Bernardin’s time (as in ours) major Catholic politicians were serving the cause of death, claiming that they were “personally opposed” to abortion, but wished to leave its victims completely unprotected by the law. Cardinal Bernardin protected such politicians, giving them political cover with his so-called “seamless garment,” which stitched together non-negotiable demands of basic human rights — such as an end to legal abortion — with highly debatable policies for promoting the best interests of poor people and immigrants. Bernardin treated unlike, incommensurate issues as if they were all of equal weight. This allowed pro-choice politicians to cherry pick the body of Catholic social teaching — fishing out the parts from which they could profit politically — and pretend that they were faithful Catholics, or at least no more unfaithful than pro-lifers who differed with Bernardin on immigration or Medicare. Nobody’s perfect!

You have unwittingly resurrected Bernardin’s moral equivalence with your recent op-ed in response to the Planned Parenthood videos. As a victim of legal abortion who lost a daughter to it, I cannot imagine how you could have written this:

While commerce in the remains of defenseless children is particularly repulsive, we should be no less appalled by the indifference toward the thousands of people who die daily for lack of decent medical care; who are denied rights by a broken immigration system and by racism; who suffer in hunger, joblessness and want; who pay the price of violence in gun-saturated neighborhoods; or who are executed by the state in the name of justice.

Do you really not see what is uniquely evil about murdering children and selling their parts for profit? As Jesus told us, the poor we will have always with us, and we must advance their interests. But how can you compare the malice of organ-profiteering abortionists with the “indifference” that you (uncharitably?) attribute to fellow citizens who disagree with you about the optimal public policies helping the poor, reducing unemployment and violence and reforming immigration?

I know that social justice is not a “single issue” proposition. I have personally led homeless missions, dug wells for thirsty Africans, and ministered to prisoners. I support reform of capital punishment and a much stricter application of Just War standards in future American conflicts. I have spoken forthrightly on the evil of civilian bombing and on America’s abuse of drones. I have published a recent book on the “Whole Life” principles that underlie our defense of human dignity in every situation. My life’s work, in fact, has been to defend the vulnerable from violence, and every step was driven by my memory of Jessica, and my anger at the men who failed to protect her.

Historically, however, the seamless garment served, not to elevate issues in addition to abortion but as a bulletproof vest for pro-abortion zealots like Geraldine Ferraro and Mario Cuomo, whose places at the communion line have been filled in our time by Nancy Pelosi and Joseph Biden. Cardinal Bernardin’s clever piece of rhetoric still helps such politicians to believe that they are free to reject fundamental moral principles such as sparing the lives of the innocent, so long as they work with the bishops on expanding health care or funding food stamps.

These same politicians can smear as “dissenters” the vast majority of pro-life politicians, who are conservatives and therefore differ with some bishops on how to best help America’s poor. Pro-choicers manage this smear by hijacking Catholic “social teaching.” But that kind of teaching, which specifies budget levels for poverty programs or particular immigration quotas, does not exist! As Popes Leo XIII and St. John Paul II taught, the Church does not impose a particular political agenda on believers. That goes beyond the Church’s mission. We can argue about the impact of a higher minimum wage or border patrol. But any Christian church must demand that the innocent be protected. There is no gray area on abortion, as there wasn’t on slavery: Human beings have rights. Will we protect them, or not?

Some church leaders have spoken clearly about the radical difference between laws that protect the innocent, and particular public policies which might be best for the common good. In his time, Cardinal John O’Connor of New York taught, as your colleague Archbishop Charles Chaput recently has written, that protecting innocent life is a fundamental and non-negotiable condition for social justice. It is not in any way comparable to public policy questions where Christians have clear moral goals we must pursue, but must use our prudence to determine by open debate what mix of policies are the most just, and the most welcoming to Christ’s poor.

This article appears on the Feast of St. Maximilian Kolbe, whom we remember for sacrificing his body in defense of an innocent Polish prisoner in Auschwitz. It was reading about this saint, and meeting devoted Catholics in the pro-life movement — most of them conservatives who saw the Seamless Garment for the fraud that it is — that helped me to overcome my natural bitterness toward the Catholic church, and finally to enter it as a convert.

The rest of my children escaped the Culture of Death. I named one of them Maximilian.

 

Below is the pro-life short film “Crescendo,” which Jason Jones produced along with Patti Mallette (mother of Justin Bieber), which raised more than $6 million for crisis pregnancy centers. It is dedicated to Jessica Jones.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • standtall909

    Excellent article. Archbishop Cupich’s statement on the Planned Parenthood butchery of the innocent is appalling! Now, it is not hard to understand why he forbade his priests in a prior post of his to walk in the ‘March for Life’. His reasoning? He didn’t want the Church to be labeled as one of those ‘radical pro life groups’. If we as Catholics were to believe in reincarnation, Cupich is Bernadin come back to destroy the true faith.

  • Jennifer Hartline

    Jason, I hope you’ve sent this letter to AB Cupich directly. This is phenomenal. I am so sorry for your daughter’s death and your loss. Clearly, women don’t always “choose”, do they? Too often, they are coerced, forced, manipulated, and threatened.

  • Leaven for the Loaf

    Thank you. I’m sharing this as far and wide as I can. In the early days of the public discussion of the misbegotten “seamless garment,” longtime anti-euthanasia activist Rita Marker saw the way it could be misused. With all due respect to Cardinal Bernardin (whose real pro-life legacy came in the way he faced his own death), Rita dubbed the concept “the seamless shroud.” She was right.

  • Djk2450

    I admire your strength in coming to the Catholic Church after all that happened to you and your wife. I know of many people who have quit the Church because of some trivial event that they did not agree with or some priest who told them the truth about being a “cafeteria catholic”. God bless you and your family.
    6/31 Inf 9 Inf Div

  • Guy McClung

    One of the primary reasons for the creation of the “seamless garment” argument
    was that the hierarchical alinskyites like Bernardin saw immediately that the
    prolife position was spot on in accord with Catholic doctrine and that the
    faithful’s advocacy on behalf of unborn babies would strengthen orthodox Catholicism
    and, perhaps most significantly, provide the basis for the first time in
    history for saying a good Catholic cannot vote for a Democrat, for any Democrat
    at any level of government. And so the scheme and subterfuge of “we must care
    about all ‘Life’ issues” was compassionately promulgated by liberals and dissenters. The US bishops via the USCCB could have written a single page that says that Democrats are Death Dealers and their party has fulfilled Cardinal Burke’s prophecy that they are become the Party Of Death, but instead they provide every four years a voluminous document in whose text is submerged the words stating that there are two intrinsic evils – abortion and racism – i.e. evils so bad, so heinous, so evil that no consideration outweighs them. It is clear that AB Bern Cupich’s attempt to morally equate abortion and some so-called “social justice” issues – his resurrection of the theologically debunked “seamless garment” cover up – tells us we must be approaching another election cycle and the liberal dissenters, forsaking their jobs as
    shepherds, are again shilling for the Democrat Party Of Death. The time for
    dialogue, the time for being nice, and the time for discussion ended decades
    ago when we in America began killing thousands of babies each day – tens of
    thousands in the archdiocese that AB Bern Cupich (thinks he) rules. Yes is yes,
    no is no, Democrats are Monsters, Democrats are evil, Democrats are demonic,
    and, without simile or analogy, Democrats Are Planned Parenthood – no strong
    memo to follow. The only reason not to say this this plainly is to play the
    deadly game of the prelates who do not want the faithful to vote for candidates
    other than Democrats. And they are not fools- they see the flood of new
    Democrats, now over 42,000,000 of them illegally here, who, if they learn the
    truth that it is a mortal sin to vote for a Democrat, will sway the balance of
    political power in this country once they are legalized by executive order. Guy
    McClung, San Antonio, Texas

  • BXVI

    This is great. Unfortunately, Archbishop Cupich is already considered Pope Francis’ right-hand in the United States – the model for what he wants and expects of his bishops. It is sad but true, we have been put into a time-warp and must deal with the devastation that will be wrought by another Bernardin.

  • GLShamma

    Thank you for such a well-written article, and for having the courage to stand up and speak!

  • samton909

    Watch Cupich. Does he really believe in a seamless garment, or only one that deflects the issues when abortion comes up?. When the issue at hand is the death penalty, or immigration, or any one of the other “seamless garment” issues, does he then insist that we also talk about abortion?

    No, He only uses the idea of the seamless garment to deflect our attention away from abortion. It is an evil politician’s trick, nothing else. Watch the man carefully. Will he ever say a word about abortion unless he has to? No, he is timid, timid, timid, and his idea seems to be that knuckling under to whatever way the wind blows is the best chance he has to be popular with the media.

  • Thomas Cahill

    Well Done on two counts Mr. Jones,
    1) I am struck by the soldierly charism in your essays, two to which which I found today. I am so glad you became Catholic. The odds were against it. You just changed the battlefield by your pure act of will and God’s grace.

    2) This brief video was a fine movie with intense acting leading to a major point delivered oh so well.

    Many Thanks

Inspiration
Christians, We’re a Team. Let’s Act Like One
Liberty McArtor
More from The Stream
Connect with Us