University President Resigns Under Pressure for Not Firing Prof Cleared by Three Investigations

University of Rochester Rush Rhees Library as seen from the Eastman Quad.

By Published on January 13, 2018

Joel Seligman, University of Rochester’s president, announced his resignation Thursday under pressure from activists who faulted him for not firing a professor accused of sexual misconduct, even though three separate investigations found no cause to do so.

A former Obama administration official who had been enlisted to re-litigate the charges for the third time concluded that there was no evidence of “a hostile work or academic environment for any female graduate students,” instead saying that a federal complaint against professor Florian Jaeger contained misrepresentations.

“Some have urged us to simply accept as fact the allegations in the EEOC Complaint and the federal complaint. We cannot do that,” reads the final report from former Securities and Exchange Commision chair Mary Jo White’s law firm.

University President Joel Seligman’s decision to resign was made minutes before receiving the findings of the third investigation. Though the findings turned out to be favorable to him, he wrote “it is clear to me that the best interests of the University are best served with new leadership, and a fresh perspective to focus on healing our campus.”

Four hundred professors urged their students not to apply to the university because of the allegations against Jaeger. The university did not fire him, however, because “through two separate investigations — one by an internal investigator and one conducted by an external investigator—no violation of the law or University policy was found.”

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

Academics working under him then filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), laying out a series of claims against the professor, but White’s report found that not all its claims were supported.

After a Mother Jones story about the complaints, students were worked into a frenzy.

“I would urge you not to reach any conclusions about what may have occurred based on the allegations in the complaint itself or in media reports,” Seligman wrote in a September 2016 statement. “Allegations are not facts, and as we saw in Rolling Stone’s withdrawn story about sexual assault at the University of Virginia, even established media outlets can get it wrong.”

The reference to fake news only angered students more, and under pressure, the university quietly edited the statement to remove the Rolling Stone reference. It agreed to hire the white-shoe law firm and said it would be completely fire-walled, with the report released publicly at the same time that the university’s leaders saw it.

Before the findings were even released, however, students were attacking the independent commission. There have been “attacks on the Special Committee and on our independence and competence since being retained to conduct the Independent Investigation,” the report read.

The complainants refused to cooperate with the investigation, saying it could compromise their federal litigation. Celeste Kidd, one of the complainants, said that the report’s findings were “obviously biased and designed to falsely call us into question.”

Forty thousand people signed a petition, and student Lindsay Wrobel went on a hunger strike and wrote emails to Seligman, holding him personally responsible.

“You are causing people direct and immediate harm — and you deserve to have to face that harm on someone’s physical body so that you cannot avoid it in the ivory tower,” she wrote, adding, “I don’t think anybody has the right to criticize how oppressed groups protest their oppression.”

“There is no evidence of which we are aware suggesting that there is currently, or has been since at least 2014, a hostile work or academic environment for any female graduate students” in the Brain and Cognitive Sciences department, the report concluded, where Jaeger taught until he went on administrative leave.

Follow Luke on Twitter. Send tips to luke@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 

Copyright 2018 The Daily Caller News Foundation

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Thomas

    “I don’t think anybody has the right to criticize how oppressed groups protest their oppression.”

    That implies that anyone who considers themselves oppressed should be given a blank check to protest in any way at all that they would like to.

    That is not so. Even injustice would not justify an unjust method of protest.

  • Folks, these kids (and aca-liberal idiots) will soon find out just how much it hurts when the pendulum slips out of the grasp of the pendulum pushers and swings the other way.

    Three separate investigations by three separate groups ALL find zero evidence to back up the claims made against their intended victim,

    and they’re upset that someone has the courage to follow the evidence rather than just believe their slanders.

    Pendulum pushers are such idiots. It hurts when the pendulum fights back.

    • Steve

      What’s now interesting is the reason (s) this teacher was legally assaulted.

  • greatjoy

    This reminds me of the frenzy produced by teenage girls in Salem, now famously called
    the Salem Witch Trials. The accusations of the girls led to mostly women, but also some
    men, being hanged and killed in other manner.

Inspiration
Needlessly Alone
Dudley Hall
More from The Stream
Connect with Us