NOAA Study Admits It’s ‘Premature’ to Link Global Warming and Hurricanes

By Michael Bastasch Published on April 5, 2017

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently posted a summary of research on the link between global warming and hurricanes, concluding it is “premature” to say human activities are making storms more powerful.

“It is premature to conclude that human activities — and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming — have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity,” reads the research summary put together by NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.

“That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled,” reads NOAA’s research summary.

The research, last updated in March 2017, reaffirms findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of “no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century.”

The IPCC’s 2013 synthesis report also found “[n]o robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin.”

For years, scientists have battled it out over whether man-made global warming has had a measurable impact on extreme weather events, like hurricanes. Climate models suggest hurricanes and cyclones could become more frequent and intense during the 21st Century.

Politicians and environmental groups often argue global warming is already making weather more extreme. Former President Barack Obama said many times that man-made warming was already causing more droughts, storms and other events.

Increasingly, scientists are publishing attribution studies that claim to predict how much more likely a specific weather event was due to man-made warming. A group of scientists with the group World Weather Attribution said global warming made record-warm weather in February more likely.

But the evidence just isn’t there when it comes to most types of extreme weather.

University of Colorado researcher Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr. said as much in a recent appearance before Congress.

Pielke noted the IPCC assigned “medium confidence” to research showing increases in heat waves and heavy rainfall events, but there’s not much evidence of a global warming link when it comes to pretty much all other categories of extreme weather.

“The lack of evidence to support claims of increasing frequency or intensity of hurricanes, floods, drought or tornadoes on climate timescales is also supported by the most recent assessments of the IPCC and the broader peer reviewed literature on which the IPCC is based,” Pielke noted in his prepared remarks.

At that same hearing, however, Penn State University climate scientist Michael Mann said Pielke was out of the “mainstream” on global warming.

Mann said “at least 97% of scientist publishing in the field have all concluded, based on the evidence, that that climate change is real, is human-caused, and is already having adverse impacts on us, our economy, and our planet,” according to prepared remarks.

Mann offered no concrete reasons for why Pielke and the two other panelists at the hearing — climate scientists Judith Curry and John Christy — are wrong about warming. Instead, Mann personally attacked the researchers sitting next to him.

Pielke was quick to tweet out the results of NOAA’s latest summary of the impacts of global warming on extreme weather.

 

Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter

 

Copyright 2017 The Daily Caller News Foundation

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Charles Burge

    “…may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable…”
    LOL…. if that’s not an example of completely blind faith in a cause then I don’t know what is.

  • Autrey Windle

    My mom always told me about the weather patterns and how you could follow them from the Farmers Almanac. She also spoke often of the patterns that recurred about every hundred years. Its funny to see them telling on the local weather here in the west about the matching unusual weather that we haven’t seen for a hundred years. O just LOL at the meterologist’s exasperation over their failure to have the common farmer’s sense.

  • AndRebecca

    Back in Anasazi days in the Southwestern U.S., about A.D.100, a 300 year drought was experienced in their area according to scientists. Hmmm…and here I thought scientists say only modern ways cause global warming…

  • Colin Wright

    Conveniently left out of the article is the part of Pielke’s testimony where he endorses action on climate change (see Skeptical Science 4/4/17)

    “Even one of the Republicans’ own witnesses, Roger Pielke Jr. argued at the 1:57:05 mark for Congress to act:

    My view – which may not be popular among anyone here – is that scientific uncertainty is not going to be eliminated on this topic before we have to act … you guys might think about a low carbon tax”

Inspiration
When It Looks Like We’re Getting Nowhere
Tom Gilson
More from The Stream
Connect with Us