‘March for Science’ Group Laments Trump’s Bombing of ‘Marginalized’ ISIS Fighters

The group said bombing the terrorist group ISIS is “an example of how science is weaponized against marginalized people.”

In this May 2004 photo, a group gathers around a GBU-43B, or massive ordnance air blast (MOAB) weapon, on display at the Air Force Armament Museum on Eglin Air Force Base near Valparaiso, Fla. U.S. forces in Afghanistan struck an Islamic State tunnel complex in eastern Afghanistan on Thursday, April 13, 2017, with a GBU-43B, the largest non-nuclear weapon ever used in combat by the U.S. military, Pentagon officials said.

By Michael Bastasch Published on April 14, 2017

The organization behind the “March for Science” tweeted the Trump administration’s bombing Islamic State fighters in Afghanistan is “an example of how science is weaponized against marginalized people.”

The march’s Twitter account sent out the tweet lamenting the bombing in reply to a post by activist Zellie Imani with the Black Liberation Collective — a group of students dedicated to “bringing about freedom and liberation for all Black people.”

The “March for Science” is being organized by activist scientists and environmentalists opposed to the Trump administration’s policies and proposed cuts to federal agencies. The march is planned for D.C. on Earth Day April 22.

March organizers eventually deleted the tweet, but not before meteorologist Ryan Maue captured screenshots.

The U.S. military for the first time dropped the largest non-nuclear bomb on Islamic State, or ISIS, targets in Afghanistan Thursday.

The Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb, or MOAB, struck an ISIS tunnel complex at 7:32 p.m. local time. A MOAB is 30 feet long and weighs about 20,000 pounds. It’s the first time the MOAB has been used in combat.

“Really another successful job,” Trump said of the strike Thursday. “We’re very, very proud of our military. We are so proud of our military and it was another successful event.”

Science march organizers have been racked by infighting over how much the event should emphasize diversity and gender issues. Some march leaders have resigned over such disagreements.

The “March for Science” started to gain traction in January, garnering hundreds of thousands of likes on Facebook. Major environmentalist and activist groups have backed the march, but sister marches are planned in other cities as well.

 

Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter.

Copyright 2017 The Daily Caller News Foundation

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Gary

    If the bomb really did cost $300 million, that is absurd. Nobody can afford bombs that cost that much.

    • Charles Burge

      It didn’t. That rumor was debunked by an article at National Review. The Air Force confirmed that the actual cost is around $170,000. (“The MOAB Attack on ISIS Was a Beautiful Bargain”, posted April 18th)

Inspiration
Looking for Jesus in the Fourth Watch of the Night
Deacon Keith Fournier
More from The Stream
Connect with Us