Comeypalooza 2: Comey Shreds Trump, But Reveals More Than He Thinks

By Al Perrotta Published on April 16, 2018

I didn’t catch James Comey’s interview with George Stephanopoulos live last night. I preferred working on my taxes. 

But I’ve caught up now, and you know what the night’s most amazing bombshell was? Reba McEntire can still fit splendidly in the same gown she wore 25 years ago on the ACMs. And Carrie Underwood did a much better job than Comey in rehabbing herself after a very terrible fall. 

Even Maggie Haberman of The New York Times thought the interview was “a much lower-grade burn than I thought it would be” with nothing surprising.  (You can read the full transcript here.)

Still, 9.7 million tuned in for the interview, which is not bad considering it was up against the Academy of Country Music Awards. On the other hand, it was still less than what Stormy Daniels drew with her 60 Minutes interview. (Ironically, both are now famous for doing the same thing to Trump.)

Fully unpacking the Comey interview would take longer than unpacking the costumes from a production of Les Miserables. (In fact, can’t you hear Comey singing “On My Own?”) But here are some early observations.

“Morally Unfit”

The major headline, at least in the media and Twitter world, is Comey declaring that Trump is “morally unfit” to be President. Of course that’s what he’s going to say. He’s got four daughters and a wife who are ardent Hillary supporters. Comey, by his own admission, couldn’t even stand up to Loretta Lynch. You think he’s going to withstand their onslaught? 

Seriously, Comey made pretty clear that his contempt for Trump — and his sense of moral superiority — predates the election. He also told President Obama that he dreaded the notion of working for Trump. This revelation poses a problem for Comey. The fate of Trump’s opponent and the Trump investigation were in his hands. Yet he wants to convince us he did not tip the scales of justice away from the man he says is “morally unfit.”

The task is especially hard when he gave evidence in the interview that he did give Lady Justice a bit of a shove.

Doesn’t Know if Steele Dossier is a “Credible Document”

In a segment conveniently cut out of ABC’s broadcast, Comey was asked if he thought the Steele Dossier was a “credible document.” Comey replied, “The answer is, I don’t know.”

Daily Caller investigative reporter Chuck Ross explains the significance of that confession. Comey signed off on the first three FISA warrants allowing the FBI to conduct surveillance on Carter Page. A level of surveillance that would allow the FBI to scoop up information on anyone connected to Page. Namely, anyone in the Trump campaign. Allowing such a staggering use of federal power against political opponents of the Obama administration based on a document he didn’t even know was credible is incredible. 

But when the target is someone you know is “morally unfit” it’s perfectly fine to rely on the “credible” former British agent, even if he is in the pay of the target’s opponent. 

The Lines are Being Drawn

Comey said Trump privately expressing hope he’d go easy on Michael Flynn is evidence of obstruction of justice. That he got a “La Costra Nostra” vibe from the President. Colorful, but not as interesting as what he says about Obama and Lynch both in the interview and in his book. 

Comey states that President Obama’s public statements and Loretta Lynch’s actions “jeopardized” the Clinton investigations. Lynch’s “strange” activities made him “uncomfortable.” He expressed to Stephanopoulos the wish he had stepped up more.

(Lynch blasted Comey in a statement Sunday. “If he had any concerns regarding the email investigation, classified or not, he had ample opportunities to raise them with me both privately and in meetings. He never did.”)

Some context. On Friday, the DOJ Inspector General report on Andrew McCabe’s leaking came out. According to the report, McCabe says Lynch’s DOJ pressured the FBI to halt its investigation into the Clinton Foundation. 

Taken together, we’ve got the makings of a gang war. To borrow Comey’s mob metaphor, The Comey-McCabe FBI crime family is ratting on the Obama/Lynch DOJ crime family.

Is Comey Really That Dense?!

During the interview, Comey said that “hundreds of thousands” of Hillary Clinton’s emails were found on Anthony Weiner’s computer. (That’s news to Judicial Watch. State and FBI told them there were only 72,000 emails.) Comey’s decision to reopen the investigation is for another story. As is the astounding revelation in the IG report on McCabe that seems to support the pre-election allegation that the NYPD found a trove of evidence on the computer implicating Hillary and her inner circle in criminal activity. 

However, what caught my eye was this exchange about the discovery of the emails:

COMEY: Somebody earlier in October, in the beginning of October sometime, mentioned to me that there may be a connection between emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and the Clinton email investigation. I don’t remember.


JAMES COMEY: I think it was Andy McCabe, but I’m not certain. I didn’t store that in any prominent place in my brain ’cause how could that possibly be true?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: But how could that not be something you remember?

JAMES COMEY: That’s a great question. I think the answer is because how could that possibly be true? How could there be a connection between Anthony Weiner’s laptop and Hillary Clinton’s emails? And so I think it was sort of a passing comment to me, and I’m sure I stored it away thinking, “Okay, well, that doesn’t make any sense, but I’m sure they’ll tell me if it does.” 

Is James Comey really saying he had no idea how Anthony Weiner’s laptop could be connected to Hillary Clinton’s emails? How Huma Abedin’s boss’s emails could end up on Huma Abedin’s husband’s laptop?!

The top dog at the Federal Bureau of Investigation missed that?  When it comes to detective work this guy makes Shaggy from Scooby Doo look like Sherlock Holmes. 

Trump Doesn’t Laugh

One thing Comey did investigate with more thoroughness than he did the IRS Tea Party scandal: Trump’s lack of laughter.

Seems after meeting with Trump and failing to leave him in stitches, Comey realized “I’ve never seen him laugh. Not in public, not in private.” The thought stayed with him. And after getting canned, “I went and tried to find examples of videos where he’s laughing and I could only find that really wasn’t a genuine laugh.” 

Who has time to laugh when you’re plotting to become a despot, right? Or partnering with Putin? Or planning to party down with hookers and porn stars? 

Still, digging through old Trump videos? Isn’t that a bit like stalking an ex on social media? 

But to Comey’s point: Trump made hundreds of millions of dollars sitting behind a desk, saying “You’re fired.” He laughed all the way to the bank.

Who knows? Maybe Comey and Trump can bury the hatchet and work together on a new MAGA project: Make America Giggle Again. 

Hands, Hair, Height and Ties

Comey spent a strange amount of time focusing on Trump’s hands, hair and height. He analyzed the color of Trump’s face like it was a crime scene. At one point Comey even dissed Trump’s choice of tie length. (Mocking a man who had his own successful brand of ties? Don’t you remember all the Macy’s ads?) 

Critics across the spectrum have been pounding on Comey for being so petty. 

I beg to differ. 

Clearly they have James Comey pegged wrong. I’ve figured it out. He’s not hoping to be a host on MSNBC. He’s trying to be the next host of Fashion Police.


Al Perrotta is the Managing Editor of The Stream, and co-author with John Zmirak of the upcoming book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Immigration. It’s out May 21 from Regnery, and available for pre-order today. As in why wait another moment?

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Jim Walker

    Thanks for the briefing. Now we know he was basically against Trump during the presidential campaign.
    He should have recused himself…

  • Patmos

    “As is the astounding revelation in the IG report on McCabe that seems to support the pre-election allegation that the NYPD found a trove of evidence on the computer implicating Hillary and her inner circle in criminal activity.”

    I heard a rumor a while back about what was on Weiner’s laptop, and if true this could get ugly. Really ugly. Like, Catholic Church scandal ugly.

    This certainly would help explain the lengths the DoJ went in trying to cover for Hillary, as she pretty clearly is viewed as untouchable.

    Thankfully, in that same rumor I heard the NYPD wasn’t going to let this one slide. In other words, if the FBI didn’t do their job, they would blow the whistle.

    Again, just a rumor, but then we have this latest IG report.

    God, help those trying to shed light on this.

    • Chip Crawford

      You raise more questions! Do your rumors really explain why men like Sessions and Wray back off of being part of serving justice on HRC? Mind mentioning their source? And do we actually have the full IG report now? When did it come out? I’ve just heard the part about McCabe being released.

      • Patmos

        I’ve heard a lot of speculation, and will not go any further than what I’ve said above, and only said what I said because it does appear like some nasty stuff is going to be revealed. In other words, I generally don’t like to spread rumors and speculation like this, but this is too important. The implications here of serious transgressions going unchecked is too much. We’ve already seen the lazy slob Hillary shrug off the law, with many enablers behind her, and enough is enough.

        • Chip Crawford

          Absolutely. She brought the artless dirty deal and both Clintons brought corruption to new lows to the party playbook way back when. Bill seems to have mellowed, but Hillary the reverse. She trusts in some land mine placed, some well embedded scheme, seemingly foolproof. It has two more than average decent Republican leaders like Sessions and Wray treading water and going around it … But God is able. We have to remember: She lost the election. She did not get elected!!! That was overturned. God is not mocked! Whatever a man or woman sows, that shall they reap. Not overnight, not the next day, but no one gets away with anything. God would have to be mocked for this facade to remain forever in place shielding criminals and allowing them to brazenly indict and prosecute their entirely more innocent counterparts.

          • Chip Crawford

            Wild thought! It caught my attention what Bill said when Billy Graham died. He made a point to go to the microphone and say that God is the God of the second chance … It surprised a lot of people covering that. Maybe it’s on youtube. What if the man continues along those paths and wants to go further with repentance and restitution – and actually turns Hillary in along with himself on these deeply rooted, hidden matters …. You have to admit, it is really interesting to think about. She’d probably put a hit on him … Lord have mercy, lol

          • michael

            I think it is likely that the president took part in some of those schemes . He had world wide ties to organized crime .Everyone form the Russian mob to south American cartels .

          • Chip Crawford

            Obama? Regardless, there’s no pass for the Clintons, puh-leese.

      • Patmos

        And as for people backing off, your guess is as good as mine: Threats, blackmail, or whatever strong arm power play they have up their sleeve.

  • Chip Crawford

    Comey turns out to be all height and no stature.

  • Ray

    Comey has his foot in the swamp. If they are looking for the swamp, it’s not at the president’s office, I’ll clue ya. They should be looking at Hillary, and following the money, and to Comey and Lynch…just look at their feet. We need some real investigating.

  • Olaf

    This article starts strong, but then dribbles down to below-the-belt attacks on Comey. In the interview Comey revealed a lot about his character, way of thinking, and actions, and this is what Al should focus on.

    • Chip Crawford

      He did; the low ones as well; sorry – but part of Comey’s record, which Comey, not “Al” focused on in his noxious book.

      • michael

        He’s not prefect . But I believe that he believed that he did best he could .He can’t talk about everything . the reason is fbi reviewed his book to make sure that no classified information ended up in his book.

        • Chip Crawford

          He’s chafed; kicking back. Made lots of errors and omissions along the way. Very political. He might care about his impact on the culture, youth, his example as a leader, and more, you know? Petty, small and cheap shots book. Come on.

Deciding to Stick to Love
Al Perrotta
More from The Stream
Connect with Us