AP Omitted Expert Quotes That Didn’t Fit the Narrative About Global Warming

Men carry a refrigerator at a residential area affected by a landslide due to heavy rains caused by Tropical Storm Nate in Los Anonos neighborhood of San Jose, Costa Rica, on Oct. 6, 2017. A national emergency alert was declared in Costa Rica, where eight people died, including a three-year-old girl, after they were hit by falling trees and mudslides. An alert was issued for people to be wary of crocodiles that might be roaming after rivers and estuaries flooded.

By Michael Bastasch Published on October 8, 2017

An Associated Press reporter sent some questions to Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. about what role global warming played in this year’s slew of billion-dollar natural disasters.

Pielke, an expert on natural disaster costs, apparently didn’t give AP reporter Seth Borenstein the answers he was looking for, because his ensuing article didn’t have any quotes from the University of Colorado professor.

Pielke’s answers largely reflected the work he’s been doing for years — that there’s no evidence global warming is making weather more extreme. Any increase in natural disaster costs is caused by an increase in wealth and population, according to Pielke’s research.

Borenstein, however, did quote Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann, who claimed global warming was “impacting extreme weather in ways we hadn’t anticipated.”

Mann is an ardent advocate for liberal policies to address global warming, and has even suggested the fossil fuel industry has launched a campaign to marginalize his work. Mann recently gave an academic freedom lecture at the University of Michigan, where he attacked his critics as “climate deniers” shilling for energy companies.

Borenstein also quoted a meteorologist at the insurance company Munich Re, who said a bigger role in natural disaster costs is that more people are living in areas prone to extreme weather.

Pielke suggested his answers didn’t match the narrative Borenstein was looking for.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released a report on the number of natural disasters costing more than $1 billion this year. NOAA said the damage from hurricanes, fires, droughts and floods would make 2017 an “unprecedented year,” Borenstein reported.

“It is likely to tie or break the record for billion-dollar weather disasters that was set in 2005,” Borenstein wrote. Borenstein asked Pielke six questions about NOAA’s report by email, but included none of Pielke’s responses in his subsequent article.

And of course, Borenstein’s article did quote Mann, who told him global warming was making extreme weather worse, despite the fact respected scientific institutions have slapped down that claim.

Borenstein did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment over Twitter.



Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter.

Copyright 2017 Daily Caller News Foundation

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Chip Crawford

    I hope Dr. Pielke and others continue to expose this duplicity. We are becoming a culture of lies. The liberal left particularly seems to rely on them so much that they automatically issue them, hoping some will go unrefuted. Even when that happens, their disinformation is already out there. Its like in the legal sphere, unethical attorneys routinely file wrong motions causing the other side to have to spend client resources to correct them. It’s also a delay tactic. In the courtroom setting, they speak out unallowed things, which have to be objected to and overruled by judges. The statements are stricken from the record, but they can’t be unheard by the jury. But I hope relevant parties will not get weary of correcting the record. What may be inadvertent in some instances, is increasingly becoming a routine tactic. There needs to be some consequences for this in order for it to at least slow down.

Fluke or Fruit? What Our Actions Say About Our Hearts
Liberty McArtor
More from The Stream
Connect with Us