Pushing Back Against Transanity in the Sports World

A biological male will not be able to play for the female branch of Australian Rules Football.

Callum Mouncey, a biological male who identifies as a woman and goes by "Hannah," will not be able to play for the female branch of Australian Rules Football.

By Michael Brown Published on October 20, 2017

Every so often, there’s a moment of sanity that pushes back against transgender activism in the sports world, although the reaction to the sane moment is often anything but sane. And so it happened in Australia. 

“A male-female transgender athlete has been blocked from taking part in next year’s Australian Rules Football professional women’s league, according to the BBC.

“Callum Mouncey, who calls himself ‘Hannah’, stands 6ft 2in and weighs 15st 8lb [= 218 lbs.]. And wears size 15 shoes, according to his Twitter account.”

Did you get that? A biological male, who identifies as a female, will not be able to play for the female branch of Australian Rules Football. As the league explained, it took into consideration “transgender strength, stamina, physique, along with the specific nature of the AFLW.”

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

Good decision! This is not rocket science. Football is a dangerous, physical sport (not just the NFL, but Australian Rules Football too). Just look at some of these collisions and hits in the men’s league, as well as these hits and fights in the women’s league. Is it fair or safe to allow a 218 lb. male to play side-by-side with these ladies?

Obviously not. Thankfully, this time around, sanity and reality prevailed. But that’s not always the case.

Men Hijacking Women’s Domain

In the last few years, a male weightlifter who identifies as a woman has broken records in women’s weightlifting. A teenage boy who identifies as a girl has been winning girls’ races. A man who identifies as a woman has mauled female opponents in MMA.

Some have been critical. Others have celebrated these accomplishments, which are anything but praiseworthy. What is there to celebrate when a biological male is stronger or faster than a female peer? How is this a breakthrough for equality? To the contrary, it is a breakthrough for inequality. It penalizes the female athletes and makes for unfair competitions.

The more physical the sport, the greater the danger to the female competitors. That’s why there was no small outcry when Fallon Fox, a MTF (male-to-female) athlete, began to fight in the very dangerous sport of Mixed Martial Arts.

It’s not “transphobic” to argue that biological males should not compete against biological females.

Yet, despite the obvious threat to the health and safety of the other female competitors, there were those who defended Fox’s right to fight. The stated, “MMA Fighter Fallon Fox Is a Woman, Get Over It.” The medical claim is that “male to female transsexuals have significantly less muscle strength and bone density, and higher fat mass, than males.” Consequently, it’s not unfair for a MTF athlete to compete with other women.

Why, then, is the aforementioned MTF weightlifter smashing records? And why, then, did a female fighter defeated by Fox say she never encountered such strength in a female before? And what if a 7’2” NBA player felt that he was really a woman, transitioning to female and wanting to play for the WNBA? Would anyone really care if, after hormone treatments for several years, he no longer had his full male strength? Would it be fair for a 7’ 2” biological male to compete with other women?

A Healthy Fear

As always, I’m not attacking these trans-identified athletes as if they were evil people. And God alone knows the reasons for their gender confusion.

I’m simply saying that:

  1. It’s not “transphobic” to argue that biological males should not compete against biological females.
  2. It’s not fair to the female athletes.
  3. It’s sometimes dangerous to the female athletes.
  4. This is nothing to celebrate.

Not surprisingly, there has been an outcry of protest that Callum Mouncey cannot play football with the ladies. As Bill Muehlenberg notes, “Sadly, the reaction from the loony left was as predictable as it was pathetic. Many are calling this an outrage and are demanding that the decision be overturned.”


One opinion piece actually had this headline, “AFL’s shameful fear of Hannah.” The commentator wrote: “Inclusion it seems is not for everyone and frankly that is a disgrace. It is a confusing and sad situation because Mouncey has basic human rights. You have to feel for her. She doesn’t want to be the face for transgender people. All she wants to do is play footy.”

Really now? The football league has a “shameful fear of Hannah”? Perhaps it is a healthy fear of Callum?

For the Moment …

On a different but related front, Georgia Love, an Australian celebrity, has spoken out against gender-neutral birth certificates. She said, “I have absolutely no issue with people who become transgender or don’t associate with a particular gender as they grow up and become the human adult that they are. But I think on a birth certificate, this is going way too far.”

She added, “You are born with genitalia of a female or a male, that’s how you’re born.”

So, even someone like Love who has no problem with an adult “transitioning” has a problem with saying that a child clearly born male or female can somehow be labeled “gender-neutral.” Yes, “this is going way too far.” Just as it’s going way too far when a man who identifies as a woman wants to play women’s football.

Once again, sanity has prevailed, at least for the moment.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • NellieIrene

    I’m glad for this moment of sanity. It really is a horrible thing to do to girls and women. And it is being brought to us by the left, who like to tout themselves as champions of women. That’s a lot of hooey. Anyway, when I was in junior high school we were playing volley ball. I don’t know why it was done, but they had the boys play the girls. They had the nets set up and I think we were divided up into six teams. The boys beat the crap out of all of us. We felt so humiliated. To this day I don’t really know why they did it. It was in the early seventies when the whole Billie Jean King/Bobby Riggs battle of the sexes stuff was going on, so that may have had something to do with it, but it still is a horrible memory in my mind to this day.

    • Morduin00

      Ironically, the left is all about prosecuting men for beating up on women (and really, a guy that hits a woman is a piece of dirt IMO) yet they will sacrifice that fight so a 6’2 220lb man can play footy with the girls, potentially causing severe injury.

      I am a 6’1 220# 50 year old male… and I, by no means, am a weakling. To allow (essentially) men to play in contact sports with women is asking for trouble.

  • Howard Rosenbaum

    Well, maybe if his shoe size was a 9 & not a 15 those supporting his cause would have been able to make a better case for his ( her ?! ) inclusion on the team. Why not address that then ? Why not do a little bit of foot binding ? Perhaps some kind of advanced surgery to remove unwanted foot bulk ? What , you say that won’t work. Well neither should changing his name to Hannah & whatever else went along w/that should either ..!

  • truefreedom

    People who think they are a woman trapped in a man’s body or vice versa are veritably mentally ill. That should be abundantly clear to everyone. They deserve our compassion but not our encouragement of their delusions.

  • Yossi

    I’ve wondered if the King Kong of classic feminism would eventually rise up aganst the Godzilla of transgenderism, but since both have the “intersectional” goal of eradicating the allegedly “oppressive and patriarchal” Judeo-Christian ethical and moral foundations of Western civilization, it appears that won’t happen.

  • fderf

    “…Mouncey has basic human rights.” So…playing on a sports team is now a right.

  • Irene Neuner

    I wonder bad bad things were when God flooded the earth and all flesh died save 8?

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    He just belongs to mental hospital. Nowhere else.

  • Dena

    I looked at some of those linked articles and read the comments. People argue and equate this to a black and white issue. It’s not a race issue. It’s biological. It’s impossible to change biology. There is more to it than changing a persons body cosmetically.

  • Becky

    Why don’t they start their own “transgender” sports divisions? Men that think they’re women can play for “womens” sports and women that think they’re men can play for “mens” sports.

No Room for Christ at the Inn
The Stream
More from The Stream
Connect with Us