No, the Pro-Life Movement is Not About Controlling Women
According to a May 2019 article in the New Republic by Laurie Penny, “The goal of the wave of anti-abortion laws in America is to put female sexuality under strict and brutal state control.” More specifically, as the headline states boldly, “The Criminalization of Women’s Bodies Is All About Conservative Male Power.”
This is a common argument from the pro-abortion side: the pro-life movement is all about controlling women’s bodies and sexuality, especially male control.
To quote Penny once more, since she repeats common pro-abortion talking points (albeit with a lot of passion and eloquence):
In a sadistic nationwide legislative binge against women’s basic reproductive rights, draconian new anti-abortion measures have also won wide margins of approval in Georgia, Ohio, and Missouri [in addition to Alabama]. This has been coming for a long time. It’s all part of a strategic frontal assault on women’s right to choose, a deliberate ploy to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling upholding abortion access as a constitutional right in the United States. These laws are not about whether a fetus is a person. They are about enshrining maximalist control over the sexual autonomy of women as a foundational principle of conservative rule. They are about owning women. They are about women as things.
The only problem with this argument is that it is entirely fallacious.
A Figment of the Imagination
No truly pro-life leaders are trying to own women. (In point of fact, many of the most outspoken leaders are themselves women.)
And no truly pro-life leaders view women as things. To the contrary, they care about the needs of the mothers as well as the babies, which is why they are there to offer these women help and support when they choose life. Not only so, but pro-life leaders constantly speak out against gender-selective abortions, since those target female babies much more than male babies.
The only “control” pro-lifers want to exert is the ability to stop an abortion provider from terminating the life of another person, no matter how small.
Indeed, writing for the Lozier Institute, Anna Higgins (yes, that’s a woman’s name) identified sex-selection abortion as “the real war on women.” As she said, “Those who claim to be concerned with women’s rights can no longer ignore the need to ban sex-selective abortion in order to protect girls from ‘gendercide.’”
As for the idea that the pro-life movement exists to enshrine “maximalist control over the sexual autonomy of women as a foundational principle of conservative rule,” this is a figment of the imagination of the pro-abortion movement.
Not Telling a Woman How to Live, Just Not to Kill a Fetus
The fact is that we who are pro-life are not telling a woman how to live.
We are not restricting her opportunities in the workplace. Or hindering her education. Or telling her how she must conduct herself in public or private.
We are not telling her who she can or cannot sleep with. Or whether she must be single or married or gay or straight or bi. Or if she can produce a salacious music video.
Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.
Those are her choices to make, and she will give account to God for those choices, not to us.
There’s only one issue we have, and it is the very issue that Penny and her colleagues miss when she wrote “These laws are not about whether a fetus is a person.”
Yes, These Laws are About Whether a Fetus is a Person
To the contrary, this is the one and only thing that these laws are about, as I emphasized in a recent article. It is all about the personhood of the baby in the womb.
As Lila Rose noted in a recent tweet (need I point out that Lila is a woman too?), “I’m pregnant with our son, due in November. His body is *not* my body. I do not have the ‘right’ to kill him. No woman (or man) has the right to kill ANY child, even when that child is 100% physically dependent on them. Period.”
I'm pregnant with our son, due in November.
His body is *not* my body. I do not have the "right" to kill him.
No woman (or man) has the right to kill ANY child, even when that child is 100% physically dependent on them.
— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) September 4, 2021
This is the heart (or, should I say “heartbeat”) of the matter, and no one can express this better than an expectant mother.
And this is why the pro-abortion camp cannot address this head on, instead, hiding behind a refuge of lies and misrepresentations (even if those pushing the misinformation believe it to be true).
And this is why more and more Americans now oppose abortions from the second trimester on: they recognize the humanity of the baby in the womb. In the famous words of Dr. Seuss’s Horton Hears a Who, “A person’s a person, no matter how small.”
That and that alone is the crux of the issue, and the only “control” pro-lifers want to exert is the ability to stop an abortion provider from terminating the life of another person, no matter how small.
That’s the gospel truth.
Dr. Michael Brown (www.askdrbrown.org) is the host of the nationally syndicated Line of Fire radio program. His most recent book is Has God Failed You? Finding Faith When You’re Not Even Sure God Is Real. Connect with him on Facebook, Twitter or YouTube.