AZ Child Welfare Agency Takes Child From Loving Family, Places Her in Horrifically Abusive Foster Care

By Rachel Alexander Published on August 29, 2017

This isn’t supposed to happen. Child welfare agencies are supposed to take children out of abusive situations, not put them into ones.

Arizona’s Department of Child Safety wrongly took a little girl away from her parents and placed her with a foster parent who ran a pornographic pedophile ring and committed sexual misconduct against a minor. They also placed her with a woman who burnt her over 80 percent of her body with scalding water.

Beth Breen, who transported Devani back and forth to her parents for visitation when they were allowed to see her, said, “What they [DCS] were trying to protect her FROM is the exact thing that they did to her.”

The scandal came to light when the girl’s court-appointed guardian sued the state over the harm. (The guardian is different from the court-appointed attorney, who’s a defendant in the suit for her alleged part in Devani’s mistreatment.)

The complaint alleges that the state “removed Jane Doe from her home and her biological mother based on a fear of potential harm.” There was “never any abuse proven nor demonstrated.”

The state’s reasons for concern might be defended. What can’t be defended, however, is the agency’s almost lethal incompetence in placing Devani into foster care. The agency having endangered Devani in that way, it’s reasonable to distrust its earlier decisions to take the little girl away from apparently loving parents and blame the mother for every problem she had in foster care.

Taken Without Justifiable Reason

According to Health Impact News, the state seized a little girl named Devani from her parents a few days before her second birthday.  (Most of the details are corroborated by the Arizona Daily Star, the major daily newspaper in southern Arizona.)

A neighbor called the police when her parents, Michelle Tremor-Calderon and Jonathan Hileman, had been arguing. There was no violence or physical contact, and Devani was not present.

The state filed domestic violence charges against Michelle. They were later dismissed. Nevertheless, without a warrant, the state took Devani into custody.

Michelle had a past history of drug use, but had since become clean. She took a drug test to prove it. Jonathan also had a troubled past, but had turned his life around. He served 20 years in prison for robbery and sexually assaulting an adult. DCS used their pasts against them. Social workers were “concerned” the parents might hurt their child and kept her in custody.

Devani in Foster Care

While Devani was in foster care, Michelle could tell she was not doing well. She noticed scratches, bite marks and bruises on her. She complained to DCS but nothing happened. Michelle finally called the police.

Only then did DCS transfer Devani to a second foster care family, David and Barbara Frodsham. She lived with them for 18 months. While living there and allowed to visit her mother, her mother noticed signs of sexual abuse. She had thumb marks on her hips, scratches and bruises. She developed a long-lasting urinary tract infection, a well-known sign of possible sexual abuse.

When Michelle expressed her concerns to social workers, they accused her of “disrupting the foster care placements” and “coaching” her daughter.

When Michelle expressed her concerns to social workers, they accused her of “disrupting the foster care placements” and “coaching” her daughter to hate being in the Frodsham’s home.

When case workers saw Devani having temper tantrums, urinating on herself and crying, they blamed it on Michelle, not on the foster parents. Devani was finally taken away from the Frodsham’s after David left her in his car when picking up a check from a state office. He was found to have a blood alcohol level of .28 — almost four times the legal limit.

Michelle was ultimately vindicated. Later it was revealed that David Frodsham sexually abused children and ran a child pedophilia ring. Devani had been one of his victims. He’s now serving a 17-year sentence.

Out of the Frying Pan Into the Fire

Incredibly, a judge in Tucson terminated Michelle’s parental rights in October 2015. He declared that Devani’s behavior was a result of her not bonding with Michelle.

According to the Daily Star, Devani’s parents had violated a few of the agency’s rules, which complicated their case to get their child back. Michelle allowed Jonathan to be with them at their visits, for example, when he was not allowed there. He was also “relapsing,” the newspaper claimed, citing unspecified “reports.”

The state placed Devani with a couple who wanted to adopt her, Justin and Samantha Osteraas. Justin’s brother warned DCS that Samantha had problems with violence and drugs.

After having Devani for 18 months, Samantha submerged her in scalding water in a bathtub. She suffered burns over 80 percent of her body. Doctors had to amputate all 10 toes. Suffering organ failure, Devani was placed in a medically-induced coma.

Samantha is currently facing felony criminal charges. Sadly, the agency and the court refused to let Michelle visit her daughter in the hospital. However, according to the suit, they did not terminate the Osteraas’s relation with Devani, so the state “would not be liable for the intensive care hospital bills. This let Jonathan Osteraas visit her in the hospital and be involved in her care, “which has harmed Jane Doe [Devani] in her mental health and ability to recover.”

Overly Aggressive Child Protective Services

Beth Breen, who transported Devani back and forth to her parents for visitation when they were allowed to see her, told Health Impact News, “What they [DCS] were trying to protect her FROM is the exact thing that they did to her.” She observed that when she drove Devani to see her parents, she was joyful and excited. When she returned her to foster care, she would scream, kick and cry unconsolably.

Child protective agencies are sometimes overly aggressive in taking children away from the parents. To make matters worse, some people become foster parents either for the money or even to molest children. Devani’s parents do not appear to have done anything to warrant taking her away from them. The lawsuit should get to the bottom of this tragic situation.

 

Follow Rachel on Twitter at Rach_IC.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
Inspiration
The Power of Looking Up
Annemarie McLean
More from The Stream
Connect with Us