Why ‘Baby, It’s Cold Outside’ Is Now an Important Christmas Song

By John Zmirak Published on December 26, 2018

Two weeks ago, I got a treat. One of my favorite living writers came to town and I had lunch with him. The occasion? A tour for the newest book by Daniel J. Flynn, Cult City. It unfolds the chilling backstory of the 1978 mass suicide in Jonestown, Guyana. It reminds us that cult leader Jim Jones was not a Christian or a conservative, but a radical socialist atheist. While he attracted followers with faked religious “healings,” he later ordered bibles torn up for toilet paper. What’s more, Jones was the darling of left-wing San Francisco. And a close ally of gay rights “martyr” Harvey Milk. The mass suicide Jones ordered had nothing to do with Christianity. It was, instead, a final gesture of defiance to the capitalist West. A dark story which I’m reading slowly. Expect my review next week.  

But I got talking to Flynn about several of his older books. I highly recommend his page-turner tome on the foibles and dark obsessions of some of the last century’s luminaries, Intellectual Morons. It skewers Margaret Sanger, Alfred Kinsey, Noam Chomsky, Betty Friedan, Ayn Rand, and for good measure, Leo Strauss.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

For a passel of worthier thinkers, see his Blue Collar Intellectuals. Learn how some of the best writers of the 20th century came from humble, hard-working origins. Flynn will make you want to go read (or go back and re-read in a fresh new light) some wonderful authors: Will and Ariel Durant, Milton Friedman, Mortimer Adler, and Ray Bradbury, for instance.

We Want the New Jerusalem and We Want It Now!

The Flynn book that’s relevant here is a longer one, which I’m still enjoying. It’s A Conservative History of the American Left. An honest, critical, but non-histrionic look at the motives that goad our opponents, I highly recommend it. Flynn identifies the roots of destructive social experiments in profound Utopian hopes. Founding leftist thinkers want to “fundamentally transform” not just America (as President Obama promised). They want to change human nature itself. Not redeem it, as Jesus did. Or discipline and direct it, as Aristotle and Adam Smith hoped to. No, to rip it up by the roots and replace it with something else, which we’ve made ourselves.

In that way, such leftists resemble those millenarian sects who formed bizarre little communes to wait for The End in the woods. Both groups find offensive three threads in the tapestry that make Western man what he is.

  • Orthodox Christianity, which depends on received scriptures and an authoritative tradition of how to read them.
  • Traditional, natural marriage as the proper sphere for sexuality.
  • Private property rights as the basis for the economy.

Of course, Marx and Engels cited these three as the roadblocks to socialism. Their followers in the New Left have remade our universities as juggernauts designed to break them down.

We need not wait for the Second Coming. We could abolish marriage, pool all our belongings, and live in the New Jerusalem right here, right now.

But Flynn rightly ties the impulse to attack them to something older. He cites self-styled Christians, such as the Shakers, who found our fallen-but-redeemed state on earth … intolerable. (Read Norman Cohn’s The Pursuit of the Millennium for medieval and Reformation heretics who were likewise proto-Marxists.) The original Christian left, such groups desired and even demanded the Kingdom of Heaven on earth.

Instead of playing Whack-A-Mole with human vices, as Christians have since the beginning, these fevered believers thought bigger. They relied on “prophetic” visions. On voices that told them we need not wait for the Second Coming. We could abolish marriage, pool all our belongings, and live in the New Jerusalem right here, right now. By our own efforts. If we just work hard enough to mortify our urges, and listen to the Leader.

Jesus Came to Save Us from an Evil Creation, Creator

And that point, you cease to be a Christian at all. If you think the world, even after the Incarnation, is still too dismal to live in. Then you agree with the Gnostics that the Incarnation was in fact a bad idea. Or else a fiction. Jesus was just a spirit, not flesh and blood. He came to skim off our spirits from the filthy world of matter, money, and marriage.

The real God whom you imagine you know via some secret doctrine that’s not in the Bible.… He didn’t mean to create such a world as we see. Christ came not to redeem it but to rescue us from it. Maybe the material world, with all its inequalities (of the sexes, and the classes), and suffering, wasn’t even made by God, but by the devil. Or some bumbling Demiurge. So the first great Christian heretic, Marcion, taught. And many listened. Many more secretly act on his doctrine without admitting it.Flynnbook

It’s not that many steps, when you think about it, from demanding universal celibacy (as the Shakers did) or voluntary Communism, or totally open borders … to passing around the Kool-Aid, when Jim Jones tells you to. Jones just sped up the process of self-extinction. He was the one truly honest Liberation Theologian. He alone walked their talk.

And that’s what brings us to “Baby, It’s Cold Outside.” It’s a wintertime classic which feminists are now pretending depicts date-rape, or something.

And God Saw That It Was Good

This beloved holiday number keeps getting stuck in my head. I think it’s because it represents precisely what hysterical leftists (some of whom claim to be Christians) are attacking. That is, human nature itself. A nature in which men and women are real things created by God. Not passing “identities” that slide like beads of mercury among some 47 “genders.” Real things, different things, made diverse by God on purpose. Real, fallen creatures who have different characteristic temptations. Not self-inventions of the god-like human self.

It’s not that many steps, when you think about it, from demanding universal celibacy or voluntary Communism, or totally open borders … to passing around the Kool-Aid, when Jim Jones tells you to.

And part of that difference has to do with how we navigate the physical side of romance. With who usually initiates it, and who sometimes prefers to be persuaded of it. Because that, and absolutely nothing else, is what happens in the song. And that’s why normal people of both sexes find it charming, funny, and touching.

Feminism: Marxism in the Bedroom

Trust feminists, whose ideology traces back to a Marxist view of the family (with women as the proletariat) to pretend that seduction is rape. But then, Marxists view honest employment as “wage slavery,” so should we really be surprised? I wonder how many of these feminists obsessed with some vision of perfect “consent” protested when parents let an 11-year-old autistic boy dance as a drag queen for cash tips at a gay bar. Could he really “consent”? How many of them denounce child marriage in the Muslim world? Or the horror of female genital mutilation, now trending in Minnesota? Much easier, and safer, to latch onto crackpot, Gnostic theories of “gender identity.”

I won’t go into the details of male and female differences here. Sane people don’t need them, and insane people will deny them. (While secretly knowing they’re real, and raging against their Creator.)

The song is a lovely, funny account of male and female desire, which needs no unpacking by me. Frank Loesser wrote it as a duet, to sing with his wife, Lynn Garland, at their housewarming party. It’s often sung by real-life couples. My favorite rendition is by alt-country singers (and spouses) Bruce Robison and Kelly Willis. Here’s the performance my girlfriend and I saw in Fort Worth a few years ago:



There No Shortcut Back to Eden

On the surface, it would be easy for believers to join in the condemnation. After all, the couple in the song are clearly unmarried. The man is tempting the woman to join him in sin. But the differences between the sexes which the song wryly jokes about remain, long after marriage. That’s why happy couples hear the song and chuckle. Maybe ruefully roll their eyes. Or elbow a spouse. What the song affirms is that there’s a kind of mismatch, a glitch, an enduring difficulty between the sexes. But that we love each other anyway, and the whole thing is worth it. That “thing” being human life. The persistence of the species, which only happens one way.

Such couples know that even a loving Christian marriage is not a return to the unsullied eros of Eden. We are still partly disfigured by the Fall. No, the Redemption Christ offered didn’t wipe out all those flaws. We will never get back in this life to the unfallen state of Adam and Eve. Theologians tell us that our redeemed state is even higher. But it’s tempting not to believe that. Especially given our struggles, suffering, and sins.

That is a temptation. As in, from the Enemy. And we should flee the occasion. Sit back, and enjoy the song.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Howard Rosenbaum

    Yeah, the desperados on the left have left virtually nothing sacred. For them it’s the end that justifies the means. That wouldn’t be so problematic were their ends of a noble sort. They’re not .
    Like their adopted “spiritual father” they are deliberate in their choice to sully even innocuous tales with the taint of their duplicity. Sure men (usually not the kind who promote Judeo-Christian values & btw almost exclusively are social conservatives) have exploited or worse denigrated the dignity of the opposite sex. Heck, the stories of what SJW’s protest about these kind of things is never more apparent than among their own crop of disingenuous fellows & felons if justice is to be served.
    So, for us who have a reasonable sense of discernment it should never be a matter of mere speculation as to what is or isn’t crossing that line which the left has drawn in the shifting sands of their moral indignation. Rather it’s the affirmation of the pleasure OUR spiritual Father derives through us as we pursue righteousness. Yeah even in that sometimes vague arena of erotic love . Something the children of darkness have not the capacity for understanding …

  • azsxdcf1

    I can enjoy the “artwork” – (FOR CRYING OUT LOUD…IT IS A SONG!) without getting nefarious thoughts, and I really don’t even want to hear any more about the nuts that cannot (enjoy the artwork, that is)!!

  • I am coming from seeing the song as originally used in a romantic comedy (Starring Ricardo Montalban and Red Skelton). And what I notice is that no protest is rising AT ALL regarding the second half of that song, wherein the woman is the aggressor and Red Skelton the victim.

    Personally, I thought the video was hilarious, especially the part involving Red Skelton.

  • Brand New Key

    One thing that has changed dramatically since that song was written is that in its day, getting intimate did not necessarily mean “going all the way.” There were lots of intermediate stages, and no one (male or female) thought of “getting to first base” as constituting rape or intention of rape.

    Something else that has also changed dramatically is that our grandmothers had been taught that if a man got too pushy, the woman had every right to give his face a good hard slap and bring the whole thing to a halt. Women today are taught to play the victim game. Have an encounter with a man, then ‘remember” years later that it was a clear case of sexual assault or rape, maybe make a public spectacle of the guy, embarrass him, make him lose his job, etc etc. People claim that women have become “empowered,” but I don’t see that at all, if anything they are being trained to be helpless, unable to control an aggressive man, so they have to rely on the police and courts to protect them.

    • Zmirak

      Excellent points, thanks!

  • This is a good article for pointing out that the reason the left is anti-clerical and militantly secular is because it doesn’t like the competition. Leftism is just a parody of Christianity, and a bad one at that.

  • Stephen D

    God made women and men differently. In healthy relationships people recognise this. In marriage, there is friendship in which the man and the woman relate as equals. But there are times when the woman needs the security and protection that the man provides. And there are times when the man needs to lead. This is especially true in the sexual side of the relationship. Erotic love is a God-given and very beautiful thing, but it is not like friendship. Erotic love is like a dance. Like a tango or a waltz. When it’s working properly the man is leading and the woman is surrendering to his leadership. That’s how God made us. It is beautiful, like the tango and the waltz.

  • adrienne

    Only one who wrote the Bad Catholic’s Guide to the Catechism (plus Wine, Whiskey, and Song) could have penned this. I mean, from Jonestown massacre to the song Baby, It’s Cold Outside, in a few pleasurable reading minutes–incredible! We Want the New Jerusalem and We Want It Now!–Pulitzer Prize worthy.

    The world awaits Mr. Zmirak’s review of Daniel Flynn’s ground-breaking and haunting book Cult City. Just two words about that: Diane Feinstein. And I speak as someone who was living the good life in San Francisco circa November 1978, but felt I had to flee that demonic town afterwards. Jim Jones was a kingmaker. Daniel Flynn deserves the credit for finally nailing down the Jonestown and Harvey Milk connections.

    One might add that Baby, It’s Cold Outside does not qualify as a Christmas song, per se. Buddy Clark and Dinah Shore’s was the real hit and best version in 1949. But I would nominate “Christmas, Baby Please Come Home” as sung by Darlene Love and produced by Phil Spector, as the really Important Christmas Song (modern day). After all, the Phil Spector Christmas album was a flop in November 1963, coming out as it did on the eve of John Kennedy’s assasination. It destroyed old Phil for good. And we all know what happened after that.

    Now that you mention it, feminist conspiracy with “Christmas” and “baby”?

  • Hmmm…

    Christians must walk in love for a return to Eden. Choices must be made to form and keep new, good habits and live the higher life of love. Grace is available when doing that. The Bible speaks of days of Heaven on earth. The giving love of the Bible (1 Corinthians 13 in the Amplified) is our high calling. God never set a standard he didn’t intend to empower us to reach and sustain. The Hell on earth is when things descend to strife with all its confusion. Choose, move toward agape (the God kind of love) in faith; determine that no matter what “they” do, you will walk free with the Lord in the Spirit according to what he has graced us to do in this life we now live.

  • Some good points. But your writing style sucks. I mean. Really. What is up? With the fragments? Bro? I feel like I’m reading. A very insightful third-grader.

  • Kilemal

    An historical perspective of the left’s obsessive, frenetic addiction to the pursuit of power and enslavement necessitating “ends justifying means “mentality is found in Mao’s Cultural Revolution wherein Mao and Madam Mao stated in no uncertain terms that said revolution “saved” China. For whom was China “saved”? Pa and Ma Mao, that’s who. Not for the millions who died as a result of Mao’s mare’s nest. Not for the rest of the Chinese people subjected to the Kafkaesque atmosphere that was pervasive throughout that unfortunate country and those sad souls. The plan resurrected and solidified Mao’s grip on power and nothing of value more than that. Move forward 45 or so years and the left in the US is using the identical strategy, with all the same targets and intents; resurrect and solidify their own power structure and render all opposition unacceptable and itself unassailable, invincible. It may not mean much, but keep your powder dry.

  • sly311

    For the Left, it’s always cold outside. And inside. And everywhere they are. Soul-less and empty. Shallow and mindless. And, more importantly, hopeless. Good article.

Lessons From a Stolen Bike
Alex Chediak
More from The Stream
Connect with Us