Vatican Hosts Conference With Pantheistic Theme
The planet is not alive
So the Vatican, under the auspices of its Pontifical Academy of Science, directed by Archbishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, is hosting another global warming soirée. The first was not a rousing success, seeing as it failed to stop the planet’s climate from changing.
But then, the planet’s climate has never, can never, and will never cease changing. No power on earth can ever stop climate change.
So don’t put too much hope in the new conference, “Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility: Climate Change, Air Pollution and Health.”
The title should shock you. Why? Because the planet cannot have “health.” It cannot therefore have a lack of health. Only living organisms can have health or suffer its deprivation. The planet is not a living organism. It’s not an organism of any kind.
Our planet is a beautiful sight from orbit. It’s our home and we should treat it as a gift of God. But, strictly speaking, it’s a rock in space equipped with a coat of air, soil, and water in which some things live. We call this coating “nature” or “the environment,” of which we are not separate, but rather an intimate, part. The air and water is not itself alive. Scientists used to know this.
Return of the Pantheists
Yet it’s not surprising Archbishop Sorondo should choose an unscientific conference title, which implies the false (and surely heretical) view that the earth is an organism. Why? Because one of his speakers is the pantheist Hans Schellnhuber, whom we have met before.
Perhaps overawed at being made a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire for his services in frightening the population with exaggerated threats of doom, he now goes by “John.”
Our John believes the planet is alive, after a fashion. Being “alive”, he says the planet can suffer “syndromes”.
Can you guess what causes these “syndromes”?
The way to cure the earth’s sickness is thus obvious, at least to John. Eliminate the source of infection. About that goal, more in a moment.
Tipping Points and UFOs
Our Johnny will speak on “Climate Change Extremes, Tipping Points and Health Risks.” A “tipping point” is a date before which if we do not “do something” we will be forever doomed (to suffer a changing climate). Many, many of these tipping points have come and gone, and surely we can expect many more.
Yet not unlike the cult that keeps advancing the date at which the UFO invasion force will arrive, the effectiveness of tipping points as warnings is starting to wane. Johnny might better serve science if he could instead speak on why he always looks like he’s been sucking on an unripe persimmon.
Mad scientists like Schellnhuber want fewer people. Mad economists, like Jeffrey Sachs,do too. Sachs advocates either killing people before they can escape the womb, or preventing their birth.
He’s awfully serious about limiting the number of people — besides himself, that is. I would give a crisp, brand new twenty dollar bill to hear the august and celebrated Sachs at this conference stand up like a man and say, “I wish my mom would have aborted me.”
After all, his non-existence would have helped “fight” climate change. Right? Curious it’s always the other guy abortionists want killed, never themselves.
Another fan of killing human lives in the womb is Partha Dasgupta, who’ll speak on “How Do Our Actions Undermine Nature?”
Like the other talks, this seems to imply that nature is something wholly separate from mankind, which is false. We’re part of nature, too. And what counts most in nature, or what should count most, is the livelihood of mankind, and not “nature” itself.
The other focus of the conference is human health. The health of those people activists let be born, that is. The Vatican’s materials for the meeting highlight a quote by Margaret Chan, Secretary General of the World Health Organization, who said, “Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.”
Now everybody knows the common causes of illness in people. Just as everybody knows that one of these common causes is not “climate change.” Worrying that “climate change” will cause ill health is like a man fretting he will be run over by a glacier.
We can presume Chan is not an idiot, since it would be next to impossible for an idiot to rise to her level. But her statement that “climate change” is the “biggest global health threat” is idiotic.
That means she was either lying about the health “threat” of climate change or that she meant her statement as a kind of joke. It’s just too bad Archbishop Sorondo took the joke seriously.