US Bishops Choose Bold Pro-Life Approach

The vote was described as a referendum on what it means to be pro-life.

By Stefano Gennarini Published on November 15, 2017

U.S. Catholic Bishops elected Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City as the chair of their pro-life committee. It was a close vote — 96 to 82 — during their annual Fall assembly. The vote was described as a referendum on what it means to be pro-life.

Naumann of Kansas City is an outspoken opponent of abortion. He instructed parishes under his charge to sever all ties with Girl Scouts because of their association with abortion giant Planned Parenthood. He warned Catholic Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius that she would be denied communion over her support for abortion in 2007.

Bold Move, Broken Tradition

In electing him over Cardinal Blase J. Cupich, the bishops broke a tradition going back to the 1970s. That tradition? To always elect a Cardinal to lead the pro-life committee. Cupich is a self-described champion of the “seamless garment.” This approach to Catholic social teaching does not give any distinct moral or political weight to abortion. He emphasizes a wide range of social policies as equally deserving of political attention from Catholics. Its proponents typically do not confront Catholic politicians that support abortion rights.

Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic and Moral Issues of Our Day.

Some commentators described the vote as a rejection of Pope Francis. Cupich is one of his most visible appointments to the American Church. Veteran Catholic journalist Michael Sean Winters called it a “middle finger to Pope Francis.”

J.D. Flynn, Editor-in-chief of Catholic News Agency and EWTN News, denied this. He was present at the meeting of bishops. He believes the choice was pragmatic and not ideological.

“CNA has talked with bishops who emphasize this is not a referendum on Francis. Bishops voting for both candidates told me it was only about trying to discern the best fit,” he tweeted.

Seamless Garment a Failed Strategy

Cupich’s own recent debacle with Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner may have played a role. Rauner promised to not to expand taxpayer coverage of abortion last year. He worked closely with Cupich on other issues, including education reform. But Rauner recently went back on his pro-life promise, with little consequence.

There is a growing perception that the seamless garment is an ineffective pro-life political strategy. Critics point out how the seamless garment has failed as such. It has allowed Democrats to extreme positions on abortion without losing Catholic votes. In fact, Democrats openly admit that abortion is a litmus test for judges and politicians alike.

 

Stefano Gennarini (@prolifeadvocate) is the Director of Legal Studies at the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam) in New York. The views expressed in this article are the author’s and are not necessarily the views of C-Fam.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
Inspiration
Because Christ Lives, Ravi Zacharias Also Lives
Ron F. Hale
More from The Stream
Connect with Us