There’s Nothing Wrong With 9-Year-Old Drag Queens If There’s Nothing Wrong With Sodomy

They're a matched pair

By William M Briggs Published on May 25, 2018

If there is nothing wrong with sodomy then there is nothing wrong with sodomy. It can be celebrated. It can be praised. If being gay is who you are, and not just what you desire, then it makes sense that people encourage it. Even in the young — as long as there’s consent. 

Take “9 year old drag superstar Lactatia,” who was seen touting for Ru Paul’s Drag Con and explicitly promoting sodomy.

Hey. Why not? You can’t complain. Are you some kind of homophobe or transphobe?

If there is nothing wrong with sodomy, then there is nothing wrong with kids having a spot of fun about it. If there is nothing wrong with sodomy, then there is no problem teaching it to kids in school in the course of ordinary sex “education.” Indeed, it should be taught. Anal sex is dangerous if done incorrectly, and the last thing we need are groups of kiddies jamming emergency rooms with the severe medical problems that it can cause.

Vegan Friendly LGBT

By the way, sweet little Lactatia got his costume, a “onsie,” at The House of Mann, which sells “Vegan Friendly LGBT Luxury Fashion Brand[s].” Because if you’re going LGBT, you may as well go the vegan friendly way.

Teen Vogue, which has published a detailed guide to sodomy, says we ought to “bow down to Queen Lactatia.” They have a colorful slideshow of the little boy dressed in all kinds of outrageous outfits.

Abuse Is An Ugly Thing

I know what you’re going to say. You’re going to say that little Lactatia was abused. And you would be right. He did suffer “horrifying” abuse. So says his mother.

After little Lactatia was heard to say, “If you wanna be a drag queen and your parents don’t let you, you need new parents. If you wanna be a drag queen and your friends don’t you, you need new friends,” a “horrifying flood of threats and abuse on social media” was unleashed.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

The mother, proud of her son — as she should be if there is nothing wrong with sodomy — said “the amount of online hate” was “absolutely disturbing.” She dismissed all the hate and pledged to continue showing off her son to audiences of men who enjoy sodomy.

The pro-sodomy magazine Out said little Lactatia was “bullied” by “conservatives.” Out said, “Conservatives can work themselves into a frenzy all they want, but [little Lactatia is] just going to keep shining and sashaying past the bullying.”

Out categorized its article under the tag “POPNOGRAPHY.” And if there’s nothing wrong with sodomy, there’s nothing wrong that, either.

Oh! Canada!

The Canadian Broadcasting Company, a “federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster,” said our little 9-year-old “drag queen shows us how to slay.” They don’t mean slay as in disembowel, not that there’s anything wrong with that between consenting adults. They meant slay as in tickling the fantasies of those who enjoy sodomy. Which there is nothing wrong with, if there is nothing wrong with sodomy.

The CBC also reports that some Canadian lawmakers were seeking to lower the age of consent so that the limit applied to all kinds of sex. “That will be lowered to 16, if the proposed Liberal bill passes, removing the section of the Criminal Code that specifically sets rules for anal intercourse.”

The old law was “discriminatory,” they said, because the the age was higher for those seeking sodomy. And they’re right. It was discriminatory. It discriminated, or drew distinctions between, different kinds of sex. If there is nothing wrong with sodomy, then the age should be as low as they can get away with.

They’re Coming For Your Kids

Now on these very (virtual) pages, our own Michael Brown was caught saying, “Yes, Gay Activists are After Your Children.

He said, “The homosexual movement seeks to grow by the indoctrination of our children, from toddlers to pre-schoolers, and from elementary school to college. LGBT activism thrives on indoctrination.”

It’s true, too. But what Brown didn’t tell you was that there is nothing wrong with recruiting kids — your kids — into the warm folds of the LGBTQWERTY community. That is, there is nothing wrong with it if there is nothing wrong with sodomy.

If there is something wrong with sodomy, you think you’d hear more about it. But you don’t. You do hear folks complaining about little boys dancing seductively. Because they’re little. Not because they desire sodomy.

What you don’t hear is folks saying “Sodomy can in no way be countenanced.” Maybe most don’t believe that anymore. Maybe they believe there’s nothing really wrong with sodomy, and the only moral question is consent. But then there’s nothing really wrong with 9-year-old drag queens.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • ImaginaryDomain

    Oh brother you are so right. I highly recommend a google search for After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s (1989, Doubleday/Bantam). In this manuscript Harvard educated marketing experts Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen meticulously laid out the homosexual lobby’s blueprint for success in what is widely regarded as the handbook for the “gay” agenda. They devised a three-pronged approach that the homosexual lobby has masterfully implemented in subsequent years: Desensitization, Jamming and Conversion.

    What has come to pass in our culture is perfectly laid out in this manuscript. Society has been duped by a marketing ploy…

    It’s what the gay agenda has wanted all along – unfettered access to our children.

    Below are two of the central demands put forth by homosexual activists in their “1972 Gay Rights Platform”:

    “Repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent.” (This should send a chill down the spine of any parent. It would
    legally allow pedophiles, and homosexuals who were so inclined, to access your children and teens for their own predatory sexual gratification — so long as those children “consented” to having sex.)

    “Repeal all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit.” (Now that marriage is redefined, there can be no logical or ethical objection to any conceivable “marriage” combination, including polygamous “marriages.” By watering down marriage, “gay” activists and like-minded politicos [usually activist judges] remove this foundational institution’s intrinsic value.)

    • Ken Abbott

      I’ll give a cautious second to the recommendation to acquire and read “After the Ball.” Just be aware some of the chapters contain rather graphic and disturbing content.

      • ImaginaryDomain

        Yes, it is utterly gross…

    • John Connor


      • Dee Bee

        In that case the constitution and its amendments are all garbage. Mostly quite a bit before 1972. Perhaps Connorism is a term benig synoymous with historical amnesia?

        • John Connor

          Bit of a leap

  • John Connor

    Laughable at best ! The gays aren’t coming for your kids. So ridiculous on so many levels. Smh

    • Ken Abbott

      Looks like *you* need to read Madsen and Kirk for yourself. “Smh” all you like, especially if it shakes the blinders off your eyes.

      • John Connor

        Continues to shake head in disbelief…

        • None so blind as those who just won’t see.

          • John Connor

            That would the majority of the religious

          • Dee Bee

            Nah! More like the persnickety supercilious non-religious

          • John Connor

            Lots of vowels

    • Kevin Carr


      • John Connor

        That ones been laughed off these forums more times than I can count. Too funny!

        • Kevin Carr

          So, NAMBLA doesn’t exist? Just because you laugh it off doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

    • Jim Walker

      They’re coming for yours for sure. We teach our kids the right values.

      • John Connor


        • brothergc

          classic left playbook response ?

          • John Connor

            Just fact

          • brothergc

            no, ignorance or refusing to see the truth

    • Dee Bee

      That intoxicating redolance must be because you have your head between your legs for a crash landing

      • John Connor


  • JP

    absolutely right. If a guy can put on skirt and think that makes him a girl then he should have the right to use the girls bathrooms and locker rooms.

  • Charlene

    Parents, if you condone or encourage nonsense in your kids, you are not doing your God-assigned duty. One of your prime duties as a parent is to say “NO,” and say it often. These cases of high school kids claiming to be the opposite sex and suing their schools (with the backing of the ACLU, naturally) are cases of very negligent parents.

    It’s called “tough love,” folks.

  • amomigigante

    Jesus wept. John 11:35

  • swordfish

    “The homosexual movement seeks to grow by the indoctrination of our children, from toddlers to pre-schoolers, and from elementary school to college.”

    I’ve seen plenty of religious schools, but no gay schools.

    • jemgeach

      Most schools now teach gay affirmative sex ed. And that includes “religious” schoolz. 20 years ago the sex ed pple were using materials from durex in classes: and it has got worse. If your child attends a normal school they will be taught the whole gamut of perversion. At present something like .1% exercise the right to withdraw their children from This filth: but they want to make sex ed mandatory. Why? Because the perversion can be increased then.
      God help us.

      • swordfish

        “At present something like .1% exercise the right to withdraw their children from This filth: but they want to make sex ed mandatory.”

        If only 0.1% of parents withdraw their children from these classes, your hysterical reaction would appear to be completely unfounded.

        • It’s 0.1% mostly because they’re not informed of the nature of the class ahead of time, and not told that they even can withdraw their children from the subversive propaganda.

  • Shaquille Davis

    Screw you guys.

    • Monty James

      Enjoy it while you can.

  • bbb

    This is child abuse.
    Thirty years ago parents who exploited their child in such a way would be arrested.
    Anyone who would encourage, watch, fund or view as entertainment a nine year old boy whose body has become a pornographic tool for adults should be arrested for aiding and abetting criminal assault of a child.
    In Mike Lew’s book, “Victims No Longer” the primary purpose is to identify children who have been sexually abused as victims of criminal assault. Therapy for these children includes seeing the criminals punished and put in jail. Child abusers, particularly abusive men who chose little boys to have sex with, have power and control issues that are not sexual but sadistic.
    Jesus loves the little children, and He cursed anyone who harmed even a hair of any child’s head.
    When cursed by Christ the abusers suffer torment after standing before the Great White Throne of Judgment, but it is very healing for children to know their abusers were wrong – not them.

  • cestusdei

    Of course they want the children. That’s always been their goal.

Is Your Heart Heavy? God Knew It Would Be
Charles Spurgeon
More from The Stream
Connect with Us