Maryland Church Banned From Services in Its Own Building Fights Back in Court

As Laurel, Maryland revitalizes its downtown, they welcome karaoke bars, clubs and coffee shops. One small church being shut out claims discrimination.

Pastor Jeremy Tuinstra meets with a small group from Redemption Community Church in 2017. Since this January, the church in Laurel, Maryland has been barred by the city government from holding worship services in its own downtown building.

By Josh Shepherd Published on July 9, 2018

Barred from holding worship services in its own building, a small Christian church in Laurel, Maryland, is fighting back in court. Located midway between Baltimore and Washington, D.C., the City of Laurel sent a second cease-and-desist letter in January to Redemption Community Church.

The city objects to Redemption meeting Sundays in its newly opened downtown coffee shop. The church founded Ragamuffins Coffee House as “a safe place for people to connect to others in meaningful community.”

After three years of public and private meetings, church leaders thought they had complied fully with building and zoning codes. But the city says no.

Threatened With Fines for Worship Services

“It’s unclear why the city has so vehemently objected to Redemption’s desire to minister to its community,” says Christiana Holcomb. “The city has been inconsistent in its policies and stated commitments.” The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorney spoke with The Stream via phone.


Christiana Holcomb

In 2017, the church relocated to a downtown coffee shop as its place of worship. Last April, they began holding weekly services at the quaint storefront. “The City of Laurel threatened the church with fines of $250 per day for holding worship services in its own building,” explains Holcomb. “Yet services have been held on Sunday mornings, when Main Street is practically vacant.”

The church began working with public interest legal firm ADF earlier this year. In February, they filed Redemption Community Church v. City of Laurel in federal court. The city addressed the matter in a brief statement.

“The suit claims the City has discriminated against the church through the exercise of its zoning authority,” it reads. “The City completely denies this claim.” On June 5, a federal judge in Maryland presided over the first hearing in the case. Both parties express confidence about prevailing in the dispute.

Meanwhile, religious liberty experts say the case reveals a larger national trend of hostility towards churches in the public square.

Outreach Through Local Enterprise

Founded in 1969, Redemption Community Church brought on Jeremy Tuinstra as pastor 15 years ago. He had new ideas about reaching those in need in the city.

“Our concern for the poor felt a little out of place,” he said to the Baltimore Sun in 2017. “Churches can be fortresses. I would stand up and preach about loving our neighbors, and I didn’t know mine.”

Redemption found a building in downtown Laurel, four miles from its historic house of worship. “The church desired to create a warm and welcoming environment, specifically for those who are unchurched,” explains Holcomb. “They wanted to open a nonprofit coffee shop and give away all its proceeds to local ministries.”

Real estate listings for the new space noted it as ideal for several purposes, including ‘church and school.’ Three churches are within a block of the storefront building. Redemption sold their sanctuary to another church in late 2015.

Over the past three years, Tuinstra met multiple times with various Laurel city boards and officials. Court documents state the church has invested over one million dollars in the space. Redemption purchased the downtown building for $470,000 in March 2015. They have since spent $600,000 in renovations to comply with city building codes.

A Heart for the Underprivileged

“Everything seemed ideal,” says Holcomb. She notes their charitable intent. “This is a church with a heart for the underprivileged and the homeless in the Laurel community.”

Redemption Community Church staff could not comment on the ongoing legal matter. Their attorney recounts how Pastor Tuinstra and his team have ministered to one homeless man this past year.

In 2017, Redemption Community Church relocated to a downtown coffee shop in Laurel, Maryland. Despite years of meetings and receiving permits, the church has been threatened with fines for holding worship services.

In 2017, Redemption Community Church relocated to a downtown coffee shop in Laurel, Maryland. Despite years of meetings and receiving permits, the church has been threatened with fines for holding worship services.

“Every single morning, this man walks in and respectfully requests to use the restroom,” says Holcomb. “He is always warmly welcomed in, provided with something to eat and cared for. That shows the heart of this church.”

“It’s not in downtown Laurel to make a profit,” she says. “They love and serve people in this community.”

Clubs Welcome, New Churches Blocked?

When the coffee shop opened in April 2017, church services began on Sundays. Then city officials “started probing and poking their nose around — and asking very interesting questions,” according to Holcomb.

Their queries included: Are you meeting for worship on the property? Do you raise your hands in worship on the property? Ominously, the official left saying, “There are eyes everywhere, and you are being watched.”

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

Via email, an attorney for the city declined to comment on specific charges. Church leaders soon learned of recent zoning code changes. Concerns were suddenly raised about such issues as limited parking.

“The city had passed a law that banned nonprofits from that particular zoning district,” says Holcomb. “They said it was to protect the historic nature of downtown Main Street. What’s interesting is how the city allows as a right secular groups such as disc jockeys, karaoke bars and comedy clubs.”

“But somehow churches are not compatible with preserving and affirming the historic character of downtown,” she concludes. Though barred from assembly to worship, the coffee shop owned by Redemption has remained open.

Local Response, Federal Protections

After ADF filed the case in February, the city soon responded.

“The City of Laurel takes great pride in applying its laws equally and without discrimination to all residents, businesses and religious institutions,” it stated online. “We will continue to do so in the future. [The City] will vigorously defend its actions in court, and expects to be fully exonerated.”

ADF has centered its case on the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, or RLUIPA. Enacted in 2000, the law is designed to ensure churches may freely exercise their beliefs as equal members of society. Specifically, RLUIPA states zoning laws cannot be used to treat religious groups less favorably.

Church vs. State

Over six years at Alliance Defending Freedom, Christiana Holcomb has helped defend many religious groups against censorship and bias. Assaults on churches’ freedoms have increased despite clear federal laws, she says. “Churches should absolutely be thinking about protecting themselves legally.”

FRC policy expert Travis Weber notes threats to religious liberty come from multiple angles. “Several trends are emerging in legal actions against churches,” he says. “For instance, government authorities have [sought to] control churches by considering them to be places of public accommodation.” He cites incidents in Iowa, Massachusetts and, most recently, Oregon as examples.

“The social hostility is often worse,” he adds. Michigan pastor Jeremy Schossau has “actually faced death threats for offering biblical counseling on sexuality.”

Weber says it’s mistaken to think churches are merely self-interested. “The value added to society by religious entities and organizations is hard to overstate,” he says.

“In the wake of hurricanes and floods hitting U.S. shores and throwing communities into chaos, churches have met so many needs,” Weber continues. “The total amount of social assistance provided by such groups is in the billions of dollars.” The FRC expert cites dozens of sources in research backing his claims.

Travis Weber of Family Research Council (FRC) often speaks with faith leaders nationwide on these issues. “This should concern all people of faith — regardless of specific beliefs,” he says. “If government officials can come after a church they don’t like, that same ability can be used to go after another place of worship,” continues Weber. “[RLUIPA] protects Americans from those who want to manipulate law and prevent people from having a place of worship.


Travis Weber

The church’s attorney disputes concerns about parking. “We are talking about a very small church of less than 20 people,” she says. “Parking is not an issue on Main Street on Sunday mornings.”

Holcomb notes two nearby banks and a dental office welcome congregants to park during services. “The parking issue is really a red herring on the city’s part,” she concludes.

“This is Not an Isolated Incident”

Holcomb cites other examples of hostility the church has faced. Some city officials have changed their assurances to the pastor. Others in public hearings have called for greater legal scrutiny on the church as it seeks to resolve zoning concerns.

“Why do churches, of all entities, need an ‘extra layer of scrutiny’ from city officials?” she asks. “Why have the city’s zoning laws been a virtual moving target here? It doesn’t make sense really, apart from discrimination.”

ADF is awaiting a written decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. In the most recent hearing, on June 5, ADF opposed the city’s attempt to have the case dismissed. They also petitioned for the church to be able to resume services while the case progresses.

“Basic principles of non-discrimination towards religion are at stake here,” says Holcomb. “We’re optimistic that the outcome will be favorable.”


Explore The Stream’s complete coverage of Religious Liberty issues. Learn more about FRC’s Watchmen Pastors initiative and the ADF Church Alliance.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • CylonesRUS

    They need to contact a Mormon high priest, they will support other church’s freedom to worship issues with a friend of the court Brief, unless they advocate anti-Christ like activities, or illegal drugs.

    • Bob Shoemaker

      Why would a Christian church contact a cult to represent them?

      • Bryan

        Why would a Church shun help when it is offered? In this case there is common ground in the freedom to worship.

        • Bob Shoemaker

          Obviously you’re unfamiliar with biblical teachings…..and God’s word forbids compromise.

          2 Corinthians 6:14
          Be not unequally yoked with the infidels: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

          1 Timothy 6:5
          Froward disputations of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, which think that gain is godliness: from such separate thyself.

          • Bryan

            Bob both passages are referring to the teachings of unbelievers. I agree that we shouldn’t add to scripture or take away from scripture but we aren’t to go through this world in a bubble either. So we offer help and healing to the broken world. We make alliances without compromising our values. What CylonesRUS suggested was getting what amounts to a reference from another local religious body, to be presented along with their case. It’s sort of like calling an expert witness except its on paper. How are we being Christ-like or advancing the Gospel if we hold the world back and don’t associate with it? I’m not saying give in or accept their beliefs. I’m saying being in the world even though we are not of it.

          • Bob Shoemaker

            I was right about you compromising God’s word and NO I didn’t ask for you dissertation on why you disagree with scripture. You obviously don’t comprehend what don’t unevenly yoke yourself with an unbeliever means. The Jews think the way you think and look how they ended up.

          • Bryan

            Having been called the devil’s spawn for playing music with drums and electric guitars, this doesn’t surprise me. Good luck to you!

          • Bob Shoemaker

            No surprise to me either. I don’t need luck when I have Christ.

          • Vincent J.

            Galatians 1:9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!

          • Bryan

            That’s true. If they, being under God’s curse, still offer to help you in a legal matter that they have some legitimate interest in, should you refuse their offer because they don’t believe the Truth? That’s my point. Not that we accept their teachings, but that if they offer or if they have a skill that is necessary, we don’t refuse simply because they have a different belief.
            Who knows? Perhaps by accepting their kindness, you’ll have the chance to share the true Good News with them.

          • Vincent J.

            There is in the new testament a scripture (which I tried to find) which says that, if you welcome someone who preaches a different gospel, then you are participating in that person’s work. I think that covers it.

          • Bryan

            Ok. So you have never eaten at a restaurant, bought food at a grocery store, bought gas at a gas station, or participated in commerce of any kind with a non-Christian? Do you repent every time you do? How do you witness to the world, if the world can only witness you from a distance? None of the scriptures you or Mr. Shoemaker before you have listed apply to the situation CyloneRUS actually described. That is not to say they aren’t true or that they can simply be ignored because they are inconvenient. The passage where God tells Joshua to take the land and rid it of the inhabitants who worship idols, or the passage where Jesus changes the water to wine similarly don’t apply to this situation but you haven’t tried to quote them either. Nor have you or Mr. Shoemaker provided an actual reason for why your scriptures are relevant to this situation. Scripture that is to be applied to our daily lives (in other words, I’m not talking about eschatological passages for example), can generally be reasoned through. What’s you’re reason for applying these specific scriptures to the given situation?

          • Vincent J.

            The people who own or work at a gas station, restaurant, or grocery store are not trying to sell me some heretical gospel.

          • Bryan

            Neither is the Mormon who might offer to provide a friend of the court brief on behalf of the church in the article.

          • Vincent J.

            Well, I guess it all boils down to me not being comfortable linking arms with mormons. You win. Congratulations.

  • Mel Carbon

    There is a storm coming….

    • Jed

      The Second American Civil War is already underway

      • Jacob Miller

        >> The Second American Civil War is already underway

        Or they could apply for a zoning variance. Seems less painful.

  • Juan Garcia

    Cities always resist churches because of a perceived loss of tax revenue. What they don’t factor in is the revenue increases and savings because of all the charitable work churches do and the busines that churches bring to local communities. Governments in general are incompetent of dealing w/any financial issue that is not easily quantifiable in first grade arithmetic.

  • Kevin Quillen

    this church should not stop it’s services. it is time to stand up and resist to the fullest. Praise God and raise the rafters! Acquiescence in any form will only lead to more oppression.

    • Starlord616

      I agree

  • Samuel Stephens

    This sounds like tyranny at its best with the city being the tyrant.

    • Jacob Miller

      I’ve read enough about real tyrants to know that this is not.

      But, is this unfair? Maybe. Or not.

      Zoning laws have a legitimate purpose. Parking, for example. Or noise. Traffic congestion. Historic preservation. Fire and police protection.

      But to call it tyranny seems a little silly.

5 Immaterial Gifts With Eternal Value to Give Away This Christmas Season
Rita Dunaway
More from The Stream
Connect with Us