Future History of the Party’s Removal of Statues and Books

The past is what we make it.

By William M Briggs Published on August 26, 2017

Author’s Note: the following was dictated to me by Party leader Allardyce T. Merriweather at the Party’s ritual Charlottesville Book Burning, which took place 12 August 2021, four years after the white supremacist rally which saw the lives of over two thousand innocent victims slaughtered by fascist forces, a rally which Party historians mark as the beginning of our Second Civil War.

People not up on Party History think we started with the books. But it isn’t so. We got rid of the racist hate statues first. That was only natural. Books came after.

Now you might wonder about this. A statue is just a hunk of stone or metal, but a book can be filled with the most illegal thoughts you used to be able to imagine! Books are more toxic. Statues are comparatively harmless. So why did we start with them? It’s simple: People can see the statues.

I don’t mean it to sound as simple as that. Or maybe I do. People see statues. They’re right there, in your face. They remind people of forbidden times; they cause forbidden thoughts. A man sees a racist hate statue and he starts thinking, “Why is that there? Maybe things weren’t always this way. Maybe there were times when it was different.”

In a sense, it isn’t his fault he has these thoughts. He was triggered into them. We should pity this man.

People are weak and need Party guidance. The past was a hurtful time. Horrible things happened in the past. Racist, sexist, transphobic, even Islamophobic things. Hard to believe now, isn’t it? That’s the point, though. We want to make it impossible to believe.

“This is why we must say that, in a sense, the past didn’t really exist. And since it didn’t exist, we can’t have reminders of it in public.”

This is why we must say that, in a sense, the past didn’t really exist. And since it didn’t exist, we can’t have reminders of it in public. The statues had to go. They went fast, too. Faster than we had hoped.

Statues — and movies, don’t forget the movies — caused massive trouble because they were visual. They were right there, out in the open. Books were different. A statue could trigger, but a book could corrupt.

You have to realize, when we started the burnings, people weren’t really reading them anyway. Most had no idea what was in ’em. How else do you think we were able to convince the indigenous populants to remove the statues so easily? They didn’t really know what they were — and we didn’t want ’em to find out.

That so few were reading history was one of the arguments some in the Party used to say we should wait on the burnings. True, books contained wrongthink, but if they were unread they were harmless. The poison in them had to be drunk to be effective. We could spend our energy better elsewhere, they said, like purging the remaining Churches.

But I pushed for it. I wanted the books to go as fast as possible. Sure, it’s true they were mainly unread, but you know what? It only takes one man to read one wrong book for trouble to start. We can never forget the danger that one man dedicated to his “truth” represents.

Besides, I likes me a good book burning. Watching all those wrongthink pages rising in flames fills me with dark glory.

Look: you don’t want some poor kid to stumble into a library and happen upon a book that contains disturbing material. I saw — I saw this with my own eyes, now — a kid walking through a History section. They still had one at this library. I was there surveying this library for its ritual burning.

Anyway, this kid chanced upon Clouds of Glory: The Life and Legend of [REDACTED] by Michael Korda. Author’s note: Merriweather spoke of a certain military leader in the first Civil War.

[REDACTED], as I live and breathe! Don’t go and print that name, now. I’m telling you because I think you can handle it, but we both know your readers can’t and won’t.

Well, I snapped into action. Right there and then, I snatched the book from the boy, and it was a good thing I had on me a lighter. I called some Party members over to take the poor boy, and lit that sucker up. Tossed it right on the pile. Woof! Whole library went up.

[Laughter] Oh, me, it does my heart good to think of it. It’s true we lost some good volumes by Mao and Howard Zinn in the blaze. But nobody said true freedom wouldn’t come with a cost.

The real good news? The boy came out of his re-education just fine. He is to this day a loyal Party member. With nary a thought of the past.

Note: The Soros Capitol Book Burning will take place next weekend. Attendance is mandatory.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Trilemma

    Book burnings are so last millennium. What about all those pesky digital versions of all those books you burned?

    • Remember when Amazon remotely deleted all copies of an offending version of ‘1984’ from Kindles?

      Remember also that you do not *own* ebooks, you only own a license for reading and holding them. The best way to preserve a book is still to ferret away a physical copy, and don’t tell any SJWs that you have it.

      • LgVt

        For digital content, if at all possible, download it to your computer first, and then transfer it to the device via USB–that way, even if the device gets purged, you’ll still have a copy on your hard drive. (I adopted this practice for my Kindle after Amazon pulled its 1984 stunt.)

      • Myth Buster

        True. I own large numbers of books and zero digital versions. Never thought about it until now, but the digital versions could be easily altered and the average person wouldn’t even know it. Ironically, that was Mr. Winston Smith’s job in “1984” – altering old newspapers to make Big Brother look good.

  • Stephen D

    During the Boxer Rebellion in China in 1900, the European legations were under attack in an old area of the city, next to the ancient Hanlin library, containing many of China’s cultural treasures. During the attack, the Chinese deliberately set fire to the Hanlin, hoping the fire would spread and drive the Europeans out of their improvised defensive area. The Europeans, under heavy rifle fire, organised bucket brigades to retard the fire so that as many as possible of the ancient books could be rescued.
    For an expurgated and thoroughly ‘revisionist’ version of the burning of the Hanlin by the Chinese themselves see the article on the Hanlin on Wikipedia.

  • Ben Willard

    Universities and schools already attempt to delete history. By removing anything that disagrees with the establishment . Removing all opposing viewpoints allows for an uneducated and programmable populace. Opposing viewpoints strengthen society not weaken them. Either you have a valid view or do not.

The Tiniest Casket
Jennifer Hartline
More from The Stream
Connect with Us