Do Some Men Have A Uterus?

Depends on what you mean by men and uterus

By William M Briggs Published on March 8, 2018

An apparatchik at a branch of our country’s most prominent abortion factory last week tweeted, “Some men have a uterus,” and repeated the phrase eleven times.

Now this was very curious. I had done a lot of work in medicine, but as a statistician and not an anatomist. I had never run into, nor heard of, a man with a uterus. But what did I know? I could have been mistaken.

So I reached out to the prominent gynecologist Dr. Manos Suaves* and asked, “Do some men have a uterus?”

“No,” he said.

“Not even in a place we haven’t yet looked because insurance won’t cover the test? Or in a vestigial sense?”

“No,” he said.


Two things sprang to mind. One, the people who are buying parts from aborted babies had better check the merchandise carefully. When human beings are that small, it’s hard to tell the difference between a spleen and a uterus, especially if the parts have been filtered through a vacuum. And given the questionable legality of the purchase, who is going to ask for their money back?

Two, since it is clear that no man has a uterus, but that this (presumably) woman said they did, and that this woman by virtue of her position is surely educated and would know basic medicine, she must have meant something else besides the plain-English “Some men have a uterus.”

What could this something else be?

Words Have Meaning

She might have meant that uterus was not a womb strictly, but any reproductive organ in general. Men have reproductive organs. Therefore, if uterus is taken to mean any reproductive organ, then it is true some men have a uterus. (Some in logic includes the possibility of all.)

This interpretation is not likely. Why repeat an obvious truth, agreed to by all, eleven times? Likewise, we can reject that by some she meant no, as in no man has a uterus. In the same vein, we can dismiss the idea that have meant do not have.

That leaves men.

What Makes a Man?

In plain English, men is a group of biological males. She can’t have meant that. Instead, as might by now be clear, she invoked Gender Theory to redefine male. According to this academic rage, a male has no biological characteristics whatsoever: it is a gender, which itself is an attitude, a desire, a mental state.

To avoid confusion with English, let us prefix any Gender Theory word with mental, e.g. mental-gender, mental-male, mental-uterus, and so on.

According to Gender Theory, a mental-gender is anything a person wants to be. A person can be mental-gay, mental-straight, mental-cis, mental-queer, mental-trans, and on and on.

That “on and on” is to be taken in a literal sense. There is no end to gender classifications. And cannot be an end, either, since they are all based on desire, and desire is infinitely various. There are already “on the books” at least a hundred of common gender-based terms, with new ones added weekly.

Try Again

With this in mind, let’s re-write the tweet using our prefix for clarity: “Some mental-women have a mental-uterus.” Since a mental-woman is a man (no prefix) who thinks he is a woman, and anybody can have the desire to have a uterus, the tweet is now true. The tweet can also be true if mental-uterus is taken to mean duderus.

What’s a duderus? Well, a mental-uterus. The word was coined in sincerity by a man who identified himself as mental-woman (he obviously did not use the prefix).

He was answering the original tweet and revealed himself to be in mental-possession of this mental-uterus. Meaning, as our prefix tells us, in possession of the desire to be female and have a uterus. Since he is a man, the poor fellow will never have more than these desires.

This is so even if some madman with a knife carves out a hole in him where a uterus would go (if he were female), and inserts into this hole something uterus-shaped. This is because a uterus is much more than an organ. It is an attached and integral part of a female, regulated by certain areas of the brain, nerves and endocrine system, and so forth.

Useful Advice

There just is no such thing as sex-change surgery. A person’s sex is fixed. But there is mental-sex-change surgery. This is to be in the possession of the desire that a scalpel has made a person into what they are not.

The next time you see anything related to Gender Theory, re-write it using the prefix. Think of it in terms of the possession of a desire, and not a thing. You’ll be amazed at how clear everything becomes!


* Just kidding. This is Spanish for “soft hands.


Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Patmos

    There’s only one proper word to use for these people who want to invent their own existence: Delusional.

    • D McGovern


  • It seems a large part of this transgender non-sense is dealing with terminology.
    So a woman pretending to be a man aka a trans-man aka a mental-man (to use terminology introduced here) has a real-uterus (the case I think the tweet had in mind.) (The fake man being a real woman has a real uterus)
    And a man pretending to be a woman aka a trans-woman aka a mental-woman has a mental-uterus
    (The fake woman, really being man has no real uterus and thus has only a make-believe uterus.)
    So the questions become: 1. What terminology will you use to keep the truth straight in your own mind? and 2. Will you play along with their reality-denying charade, or speak the truth and incur their indignation and/or wrath?

  • Nemesis

    You are a bloody liar!
    You haven’t reflected on your actions at all.
    You threaten me again, “I pray for your early death.”

    William M. Briggs said, ”Hey! This is cheating. Every time I see you sent an email, I am happy.
    And when I see there is an attachment, I am happier.
    And then it turns out not to be a picture of you, and I am sad!. (But still happy!),”
    ”No, not wordplay. Flirting is saying that you like somebody, even that you want them, but in a happy way,”
    ”Flirt =I can tell you that you are pretty and that I would like to see you come out of the shower, and you can say I am cute,”
    ”After kissing your neck, I’d slide my hands behind you, rubbing your back and butt.,
    Then I’d kiss your lips and slide my hands to your front, and start to take off your blouse…,”
    ””It was good”? Do you mean we can cook in your room? Would people in your apartment know if you had a visitor?,”
    ”I am a great cook! I can make you a very good chicken thigh dish. And lots of different vegetables. I will look at the site.
    Do you have a kitchen in your apartment?,”
    ”I will never tell anybody anything you tell me. I am your doctor and doctors are not allowed to talk!,”
    ”I am very happy to have met you,”
    ”It is better to do things very slowly. I was stupid for going too fast!”

  • tz1

    First there is an error in that you don’t define “male”.

    There is a syndrome where the cells are insensitive to androgen so although chromosomally, they are XY, which would be male, they appear female and HAVE A UTERUS.

    Unless you define “Male” as not having a uterus, this breaks your model.

    An XY female with IVF and hormone therapy managed to be pregnant and deliver a baby in the UK a few years ago (I couldn’t find the link easily, but a bit of search should find it).

    Are such people who HAVE a UTERUS but are CHROSOME XY male or female?

    If you are Catholic or some other Christians, there is an exclusively MALE priesthood so it does matter.

    • Alice Cheshire

      Using a rare condition to address a common political fiction is a sign you have no real answer to the argument but you are hoping no one notices how foolish you are. It’s just a proclamation that you are hooked on semantics and have no real arguments.

      • tz1

        I’m attempting to use reason and logic. Sorry you can’t keep up.
        The title itself is “Do some Men have a Uterus?” is what I’m attempting to ask questions and clarify.
        Only if you define Man and Woman and the differences can you answer the question, which the post and author fails to do.
        In this case there is a being with both a Y chromosome and a (originally shrunken) Uterus. Which sex?
        I note you didn’t answer. But that is the point. I also mention the Catholic Church where only men can be priests, so can this person be a priest?

        But to attack your point more directly, a rare exception is only an exception if it violates a rule. But you have NOT admitted there is a rule, and if there is an exception, then the rule needs to be altered to include the exception, or it is then falsified.

        • James

          How do YOU define man and woman?

          • tz1

            You first. I don’t say this to evade, only that if I answer, in previous cases the only response is to attempt to pick apart my statement, not to make their own rational case. I’ve asked several critical questions, and have thought about it deeply, and can come up with an answer which I am not certain about, but am willing to explain. But I am not willing to launch a clay pidgeon that you will attempt to shoot down because you said “pull!”.

          • James

            That’s exactly what you are doing. Your thesis seems to be intersexuality proves that “man” and “woman” have no meaning, but you refuse to be straightforward about it.

          • tz1

            You have still not provided YOUR thesis or definiton of what or who is a Man or Woman, and I said you merely have to provide yours and I will provide mine. But apparently you have no idea, but I would like you to state so plainly – “I don’t know” is the wisest answer when it is true – and then I will answer.

          • James

            Very well. I keep it simple:

            A man is an adult biological male.

            A woman is an adult biological female.

            The key biological characteristic of whether someone is male of female is not genetic, but morphological. A genetic XY with female anatomy is still a female. I’m sure there are rare cases that are more difficult to clearly resolve, but these cases are rare.

            And no, surgically and hormonal altered male anatomy is not female anatomy.

          • tz1

            Thank you. You use a morphological definition.
            Generally I agree. Although there can by XY with female anatomy, the definitonal case is male anatomy – testes and penis (and internal support).

  • Alice Cheshire

    The correct term is pseudomale and pseudofemale. If you want to further distingquish, you can add surgically induced pseudomale/female or mentally induced pseudomale/female.

  • Kevin Quillen

    The fact that this is even discussed is evidence that we have fallen to a depth from which there is no return. America R.I.P.

  • James

    I think what this refers to is that females who identify as men (transmen) have uteruses.

A Picture of Prayer
Dudley Hall
More from The Stream
Connect with Us