Wikileaks: Clinton Team Finds Catholics Deplorable

By John Zmirak Published on October 12, 2016

With the week Donald Trump has been having, Hillary Clinton could probably shoot someone on Fifth Avenue, and not lose any votes. At least she might get away with it in the media, if the target were one of the “basket of deplorables” whom she said are half of Trump’s supporters — some one in five Americans. (See yet another leaked email for the news that Hillary hates “everyday Americans.”)

Now it’s even clearer, thanks to Wikileaks, which kinds of people Hillary’s team deplores — and will treat accordingly, once they wield the bloated powers of the presidency.

High up on that list is believing Catholics and evangelicals. Among the 1,000 emails which the trolls at Wikileaks hacked from the office of Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, is one really telling note. In it, Hillary Clinton’s communications director Jennifer Palmieri corresponds with John Halpin of the leftist Center for American Progress. It’s reprinted below.

Clinton memo

If you were a Beltway political hack, you would get how “friggin” funny it is that Rupert Murdoch had his kid baptized in the Jordan, where Jesus was baptized. What kind of a medieval troglodyte would go in for a gesture like that? It’s not as if sophisticated liberals venerated sacred places associated with their own revered religious leaders (see Manhattan’s “Margaret Sanger Square”).Margaret-Sanger-Square_NYC

But you really would need to be a jaded ex-Catholic (maybe with an Irish last name like “Halpin” or an Italian one like “Palmieri”) to understand the nuances in the rest of this message. It would help if you held evangelical Christians in utter contempt, and assumed that the rest of the country agrees with you — to the point that “rich” conservatives would actually choose to be Catholic instead because it is more “socially acceptable.”

What makes it acceptable, of course, is Catholicism’s “systematic thought,” which is rich in what Palmieri clearly considers sophisticated mumbo-jumbo, such as “Thomistic thought” and “subsidiarity.” But what makes Catholicism attractive to conservatives, of course, is its “severely backwards gender relations.”

As someone who didn’t convert to Catholicism to impress any rich friends, but grew up in it and fought for it in such hostile environments as a post-Catholic high school and Yale University, let me unpack the Hillary team email just a little. Hillary’s people don’t despise all Catholics. That wouldn’t be fair. It wasn’t Joe Biden’s or Tim Kaine’s fault that their parents decided to baptize them (though not in the Jordan) and plunk them in Catholic school. It was probably just to keep them from getting stabbed in the local, Democrat-run public school.

But those good Democrats had the decency not to “bastardiz[e]” the Catholic faith by believing in its central teachings. Let’s leave aside the sanctity of life — since Kaine and Biden did. Two of the most crucial points in the Catholic way of understanding the Gospel do indeed entail “Thomistic thought” and “subsidiarity,” and no, it isn’t quite true that “no one knows what the hell they are talking about” on those subjects. In fact, I can explain both in simple, monosyllabic words that even Democrats can understand.

“Thomistic thought” says that just cause man fell, he’s not too dumb or bad to “get” the world. His brain still works, just not as well. So when he reads the Good Book, he can use his brain to see how its truths and rules play out in day to day stuff. (Like don’t kill kids that have not been born yet and sell their parts for cash. It’s wrong.)

“Subsidiarity” says that the U.N. should not run the high school down the street. The White House should not set your town’s tax rates. The best way to run stuff is to let folks who are close to that stuff do it. They know more, and so they make better picks on what to do. Plus, they are the ones who have to live with it, so it’s more fair that way.

And just for fun:

“Severely backward gender relations” is how mean girls speak of the Church since it does things in old ways. Christ lived in the past, so He did things in old ways, but He would do them our new way if He were here now, since He does what we like and gives us what we want.

Whew, that was hard to write. But the effort was instructive. Now I know how to speak, very slowly, to the graduates of Jesuit colleges like Tim Kaine, who have long ago decided that faithful Christians are always wrong, whatever we do: When we speak simply and to the heart, we are snake-handling bigots. When we use philosophical language, we are juggling sophistries to cover some sinister agenda. We are the enemy. We must be stopped. We are Deplorables.


Follow John on Twitter

John Zmirak is Senior Editor of The Stream, and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Catholicism.

React to This Article

What do you think of our coverage in this article? We value your feedback as we continue to grow.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Like the article? Share it with your friends! And use our social media pages to join or start the conversation! Find us on Facebook, Twitter, Parler, Instagram, MeWe and Gab.

Is the Devil in the Details, or is God?
David Jeremiah
More from The Stream
Connect with Us