ACLU Continues Attacks on Catholic Hospitals in New Report

In 'Health Care Denied,' the American Civil Liberties Union claims that Catholic hospitals are endangering women.

By Dustin Siggins Published on May 7, 2016

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is continuing its efforts to force Catholic hospitals to conduct abortions and engage in other medical procedures banned by the American bishops’ Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Healthcare Services (ERD).

On Thursday, the group published a report in partnership with MergerWatch — a group dedicated to eliminating religious objections to morally problematic medical practices in the health care industry — titled Health Care Denied. The subtitle made the charge explicit: “Patients and Physicians Speak Out About Catholic Hospitals and the Threat to Women’s Lives.”

 The ACLU’s Charges

Noting that “One in six hospital beds in this country is now in a facility that abides by Catholic restrictions on care,” the report claims these Catholic hospitals deny women necessary care and provides stories of women who claim the ERD put their health at risk.

“When a pregnant woman seeks medical care at a hospital, she should be able to trust that decisions about her treatment will be based on medicine, not religious policies,” said ACLU Deputy Legal Director Louise Melling in a statement e-mailed to reporters. “Distressingly, in an increasing number of hospitals across this country, that is not the reality.  We all have a right to our religious beliefs — but that does not include the right to impose those beliefs on others, particularly when that means closing the door on patients seeking medical care. ”

The report makes three recommendations, according to an ACLU press release. It pushes the federal government to state that “all hospitals, regardless of religious affiliation, are required by federal law to provide emergency reproductive health care,” it demands that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services investigate and punish Catholic hospitals for alleged violations “of federal laws requiring emergency care,” and says “a change in public policies” are needed to expand access to abortion, contraception, tubal ligations and other practices the ERD ban.

The ACLU did not respond to multiple requests for comment about the quality of Catholic health care, the ACLU’s years-long targeting and lawsuits against Catholic hospitals and whether the ACLU believes the scientific evidence of an unborn child’s humanity.

Leading Catholic Group Responds

“The government is not doing the Catholic Church a favor by allowing them to provide health care to a needy public,” a spokesperson for The Catholic Association (TCA) told The Stream. 

“Catholic hospitals provide top notch care for the sick and poor, care that is desperately needed,” continued TCA Advisory Board Member Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie. “Like other faith-based endeavors, they have strong fundraising capabilities, a very motivated pool of volunteers, and can be depended on to give service in cost effective ways. They are consistently represented in lists of top facilities.”

According to Christie, “the ACLU seeks to enthrone the modern version of ‘women’s healthcare’ and ‘reproductive services’ as the only way to care tenderly for women and children. It dismisses the deeply humane and ethical Christian vision of health and reproduction and seeks to remove it from the public square.”

This, she said, “violates religious liberty, and as important, puts over 200 million Americans a year that are helped by Catholic Hospitals in danger of losing their care.”

In a press release announcing the report, the ACLU cited its several lawsuits against Catholic hospitals and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), as well as the U.S. government for letting the USCCB “deny reproductive health care access to survivors of human trafficking.” One of those lawsuits, against Trinity Hospital, was rejected by a federal court last month.

Christie said U.S. law allows allows Catholic hospitals to refuse to provide abortions or other procedures deemed to be immoral. “The United States has a long and proud history of respect for the conscience rights of all people, including health professionals. The government cannot, legally, coerce doctors, nurses, or hospital systems to perform procedures like abortion that violate their deeply held beliefs,” she said.

The Church’s “Zealous” Service

Christie said that the ACLU’s focus on abortion ignores the long history of Catholic health care. “The Catholic Church has zealously served the sick throughout history, and in this country the Church and the lay faithful run hospitals and serve the ailing in great numbers. Their ministry is rooted in a commitment to defend and promote human dignity. To perform an abortion would be the gravest assault on human dignity, as it destroys an innocent baby, and a Catholic health provider considers both the mother and the child to be patients and deserving of care.”

“As such, denying a woman an abortion does not hurt her, but preserves for her an irreplaceable daughter or son,” she continued. “In this country, where abortion is legal and widely available, there are many options for women who cannot agree with this assessment. In the same way, sterilization is widely available and can be accessed without involving health professionals who understand and abide by the Church’s teachings.”

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • O’Pinyon

    May God continue to protect those who serve Him in Catholic hospitals, and may the ACLU use their talents and resources in better ways.

    • 6thinclass

      Or, should we agree in prayer to render the ACLU ineffective? I came to the conclusion of praying for an intervention of ACLU activities this morning. I’m in – join me!

      • O’Pinyon

        Yes, I agree, preferring that ACLU members be saved and use their talents and resources effectively, for good.

        • 6thinclass

          Granted you do have a point about the salvation for the ACLU members. My daily prayer includes salvation of the unbelievers, atheists, agnostics & those believers in false (gods) religions/cults.

  • Dean Bruckner

    ACLU = Anti-Christian League of the Underworld

  • Stephen D

    ACLU is making a false distinction between its views and religion. ACLU believes in what it calls “Civil Liberties”. This is not science. There is no difference in kind between the ethical code of ACLU and that of the Church. Both have ethical standards. In neither case are those standards scientific. In both cases they are “faith” calls. The question is, which is better?
    ACLU is also wrong in thinking that healthcare and religion can be separated. Public healthcare has from ancient times been a religious or faith exercise and it continues to be so. Medical science provides the factual input. But inevitably its application must be motivated and guided by an ethical (non-scientific, or faith-based) code of caring.
    Give me the Church any day. The Church has an unmatched depth of understanding on ethical issues. It has integrity. It has a clearly stated position. And it genuinely cares about the total welfare of people it interacts with.
    I would rather have the Church running hospitals, which it has been doing for nearly 2000 years, than ACLU, which has no such experience and is clearly ignorant of the profound ethical issues involved.

    • Luke Young

      While I agree with your conclusion, I cannot agree with one of your premises. You state science as a condition of “factual input”. However, current scientific trends are–and have been for some time–empirically based. This is not an issue of science; rather, it is an issue of philosophy.

      Science can give factual input about what is going on. Moral philosophy professes input about whether an action is right or wrong. Both science and philosophy are at some level based on faith. You seem to hold a position that claims science is more authoritative. I would question that, as such a claim would be philosophical, not scientific. In other words, there is no empirical evidence that science, as the empirical study of the physical world, is a more truthful account of our world.

  • Rita_S

    Women’s lives are not endangered when abortion is not and option. An abortion puts a woman’s life in danger and is not healthcare.

  • Noel Voos

    Webster defines care as “effort made to do something correctly, safely, or without causing damage”.

    How exactly does the dismantling of a developing human being in the womb become labeled and defined as health CARE?

    How a physician – even despite liberal mindset – can call themselves such and violate the Hippocratic oath of “First Do No Harm” – is just as confusing

Lessons From a Stolen Bike
Alex Chediak
More from The Stream
Connect with Us