Summer Causes Climate Change Hysteria

Extreme temperatures indicate weather's pattern rather than global warming.

By Roy Spencer Published on July 5, 2018

Summers in the U.S. are hot. They always have been. Some are hotter than others.

Speaking as a Ph.D. meteorologist with 40 years’ experience, this week’s heat wave is nothing special.

But judging from the memo released on June 22 by Public Citizen (a $17 million per year liberal/progressive consumer rights advocacy group originally formed by Ralph Nader in 1971 and heavily funded by Leftwing billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations), every heat wave must now be viewed as a reminder of human-caused climate change. The memo opines that (believe it or not) the news media have not been very good about linking weather events to climate change, which is leading to complacency among the public.

Hottest New York Summer?

The June 22 memo focus was on the excessive heat in New York State, so let’s begin our journey down Hysteria Lane there. The official NOAA average maximum temperatures for every June since 1895 in New York look like this:

Fig. 1. Average June maximum temperatures in New York state for every year from 1895 through 2017 (Source: NOAA).

The long term trend is not statistically different from zero. June 2018 is not yet available at the NOAA website, but from what I’ve seen for the global June Climate Forecast System map at WeatherBell.com, it looks like it was near the long-term (20th Century) average.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

When do you suppose the hottest temperature ever recorded in New York was? Clearly, with global warming, it must be in the last 20 or 30 years, right?

Wrong.

It was 109 deg. F. on July 22, 1926 in Troy, New York. In contrast, the state record for the coldest temperature was much more recent: -52 deg. F on Feb 18, 1979, at Old Forge, New York.

Average Temperatures Remain Average

What about this week’s heat wave? Let’s look at NOAA’s GFS forecast model 5-day average temperatures for this week (Monday through Friday, July 2-6, 2018, graphic from WeatherBell.com):

Fig. 2. 5-day forecast average temperature departures from average over North America from the GFS model (graphic courtesy of WeatherBell.com)

As you can see, the excessive heat is regionally isolated, which is exactly what we expect for weather … not for climate change. See those colder-than-average areas? Why aren’t those being blamed on climate change, too? They look like they approximately cancel out the warm area over the Northeast U.S., which is often the case for weather (not climate change) variations.

That was a 5-day forecast for this week. Next let’s look at what was actually observed over the last couple days (July 1-2), which were very hot in the Great Lakes and Northeast:

Fig. 3. Oregon State University Prism temperature analysis for July 1-2, 2018, as departures from the 1981-2010 average.

What we see is that there were cold temperatures in the western U.S., again an indication of a temporary and localized weather pattern … not “global warming,” which would be warmer everywhere.

“Climate Change”

How about extreme high temperatures in the U.S in general? Here are the yearly total number of days above 100 and 105 deg. F, again for the years 1895 through 2017, based upon official NOAA data:

Fig. 4. Yearly average number of days per U.S. station having at least 100 or 105 deg. high temperatures, 1895 through 2017.

We see no trend in the number of days with excessive heat.

So, what do we make of the claims in the Public Citizen memo? Well, they mention that we have seen 1.1 deg. C of warming since the Industrial Revolution. Think about that. Less than 2 deg. F warming in about 200 years, part of which is likely to be natural, based upon temperature proxy estimates over the last 2,000 years for the Northern Hemisphere:

2000-years-of-global-temperatures-industrial-revolution-start

Fig. 5. 2,000 years of Northern Hemisphere temperature variations from an average of a number of temperature proxies. The period of substantial human-caused warming is generally agreed to be only since 1950 (U.N. IPCC AR5).

A Realistic Approach to Global Warming

Am I claiming that there is no such thing as human-caused warming? No. I’m claiming that it is overblown. We already know the climate models (which are the basis for proposed changes in energy policy to get us away from fossil fuels) are producing generally twice as much warming of the atmosphere-ocean system as has been observed. The most recent energy budget analysis of surface and deep-ocean warming suggests that the climate system is only half as sensitive to our CO2 emissions as you are being told … maybe 1.5 deg. C of eventual warming from a doubling of atmospheric CO2. At 410 ppm, we are currently half way to doubling.

And even THAT reduced estimate of future warming assumes ALL of the warming is human-caused! If a portion of recent warming is natural, the less the human-caused global warming problem becomes.

Finally, the Public Citizen memo claims that today’s technology would already allow 80 percent to 100 percent of our energy to come from renewable sources. This is patently false. Solar and wind are relatively diffuse (and thus expensive) sources of energy which are intermittent, requiring fossil fuel (or nuclear) backup. It would be exceedingly expensive to get even 50 percent of our energy from such sources. Maybe someday we will have such technologies, but until that day arrives, the massive amount of money that would be required to achieve such a goal would worsen poverty, which historically has been the leading cause of premature death in the world.

 

Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D., is a Principal Research Scientist in Climatology at the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (source of satellite-derived global temperature data) flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, and a Senior Fellow of The Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation.

Originally published at drroyspencer.com. Reprinted and adapted with permission.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Paul

    I forgot I need to add some more to my self description:

    Deplorable climate denying bitter clinger.

    • Charlene

      Of course they don’t care. Every time they stage a protest, they leave a ton of litter behind. They are all talk.

      • Paul

        that’s a micro aggression, perhaps the snowflakes are actually depositing urban mulch in an effort to shade the urban heat island. I shouldn’t give them ideas.

  • Nick Stuart

    I’ll pay attention to the climate hysteria when its votaries walk their talk:
    *Celebrities like Al Gore sell their ocean front property
    *Celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio ramp back their lifestyles and stop using private jets.
    *There are windmills in Nantucket Sound
    *Climate “scientists” start having their meetings via Internet webinar instead of jetting to ritz luxe destinations like Davos Switzerland and Fiji.

    • Derpitudinous_Neologism

      Celebrities like Al Gore sell their ocean front property

      ROFLMAOMAOMAOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLMAOMAO

      You made me MAO! Algore oceanfront property! MAO!

  • Derpitudinous_Neologism

    We can resist propagandists misleading about the science by looking at temperature anomalies.

    See, we can normalize it by comparing month-to-month anomalies, year-to-year, season-to-season, etc.

    Doing this, we know that man continues to warm the earth, unabated.

  • Jed

    My gender studies professora says climate change is “settled” science —

    based on “calculus” stuff …

    But she says that “science” is a Euro-phallic social construct …
    built to support Capitalist White Privilege.

    Except in the case of “climate” science.

    Feminist “science” accesses “alternate ways of knowing” to make it holistic, transcient, located and negotiated. That’s why womyn are “better” at calculus and stuff …
    She can “feel” the right answers calling to her, she says.

    “Reason” she says disproves God and religion and
    –> especially <– "salvationist" Christianity.

    But Gaia the Earth goddess …Mother Nature herself .. is in travail due to

    "hot flashes" brought on by too much CO2 and vapor and stuff.

    One day, my gender studies professor felt marginalized …
    She couldn't balance her checkbook and bounced a check …
    She was livid … at the capitalist bank gouging fees.

Inspiration
I Wasn’t the Best Choice for a Husband
Mark Davis Pickup
More from The Stream
Connect with Us