Shameful: Liberal Activists Tell FCC Chairman’s Kids Their Dad is an ‘Evil’ ‘Murderer’

Net neutrality decision leads misguided activists to harass public servant's family.

By Published on November 26, 2017

Net neutrality activists left signs at Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai’s house Saturday, telling his children that their father was an “evil” man who “murdered” democracy.

The cardboard signs list Pai’s children by name, telling them that “you don’t have to be evil.” Pai’s leadership of the FCC has been fraught with criticism due to his rejection of net neutrality policies advocated by former President Barack Obama’s administration. The FCC announced last week that it plans to role back net neutrality rules, triggering protests outside the Pai family’s home for the second time this year.

Pai argues that it is in the country’s best interest to keep the internet a free and open market, and that means eliminating government regulations. His critics, however, argue that continued government intervention is necessary to prevent massive corporations from monopolizing the internet and racking up data costs.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

Obama-era neutrality rules would have legally prevented internet service providers (ISPs) such as Comcast from discriminating against certain types of traffic. These regulations would effectively prevent ISPs from providing faster internet to higher-paying customers.

For an extended period of time, the FCC hosted an online forum for the public to submit comments and thoughts on net neutrality rules. While the whole process was an attempt at bureaucratic democracy, it ended up as sort of a mess due to the appearance of hundreds of thousands of fake posts from all parts of the world, including so many duplicates, and thus of highly unlikely authenticity.

Now, weeks after the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System for net neutrality rules closed, the federal agency is pushing ahead.

The vote on Pai’s proposal is likely to occur in December.

 

Follow Anders on Twitter

Send Tips: anders@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Copyright 2017 The Daily Caller News Foundation

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • rick dean

    “Obama-era neutrality rules would have legally prevented internet service
    providers (ISPs) such as Comcast from discriminating against certain
    types of traffic. These regulations would effectively prevent ISPs from
    providing faster internet to higher-paying customers.”

    Why speak in the past tense of something that is in the present tense? Net neutrality is in place NOW! The “Obama-era neutrality rules” were put in place to insure that what was there, from the beginning of the internet, would continue to be there.

    If net neutrality is eliminated, “discriminating against certain types of traffic” would most certainly be directed toward conservative viewpoint traffic.

    This is simply a power/money grab by big business.

  • Dean Bruckner

    roll out, not role out

Inspiration
The Play’s the Thing
Al Perrotta
More from The Stream
Connect with Us