Court Rules Against School With No-Sex-Before-Straight-Marriage Rule

By Published on July 16, 2018

The Canadian Supreme Court ruled that provincial law societies can refuse to accredit graduates from schools that ban sex outside of heterosexual marriage, a Sunday report revealed.

A 7-2 vote validated the decisions made by Ontario and British Columbia law societies to deny licenses to graduates of Christian liberal arts school Trinity Western University, according to The Globe and Mail.

DCNF-300

“Limiting access to membership in the legal profession on the basis of personal characteristics, unrelated to merit, is inherently inimical to the integrity of the legal profession,” the majority opinion, written by five judges, stated.

The school indicated that it would reconsider its “community covenant,” forbidding sex outside of heterosexual marriage.

“We will review the community covenant, I’m sure,” Trinity Western University’s potential law school executive director Earl Phillips said to The Globe and Mail. “This really means that diversity in Canada doesn’t have room for a small, free-standing university with Christian principles to operate a law school.”

Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.

Phillips is not yet the executive director of the law school because British Columbia’s Ministry of Advanced Education has not approved it. Lower courts had previously split their verdicts regarding the school’s ability to institute its “community covenant.” Ontario’s top court decided against Trinity Western, but the British Columbia appeal court sided with the school, citing religious freedom.

The five judges who authored the Supreme Court’s majority opinion did not believe their ruling would significantly impair the school’s religious freedom because Trinity Western did not frame the covenant as imperative to the students’ exercise of religion.

A sixth judge, who also voted with the majority, noted that non-Christian students could attend the school and reasoned that the covenant would adversely impact them and that the case therefore did not pertain to religious freedom.

“The unequal access resulting from the Covenant is a function of accommodating religious freedom, which itself advances the public interest by promoting diversity in a liberal, pluralist society,” wrote the two dissenting judges. They argued that the law societies could only approve or deny Trinity Western’s law school based on its performance.

 

Follow Rob on Twitter and email him [email protected].

Copyright 2018 Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Like the article? Share it with your friends! And use our social media pages to join or start the conversation! Find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, MeWe and Gab.

Inspiration
Military Photo of the Day: Through the Smoke
Tom Sileo
More from The Stream
Connect with Us