Do Christian Kids Really Understand the Gospel?

By Sean McDowell Published on June 10, 2017

The longer I talk with Christian young people, the more I wonder how many truly grasp the gospel. Of course, many know the story of Jesus, but this is far different from knowing the nature of the gospel. Let me explain.

One of the most common messages I give to students is called “True For You, But Not True For Me.” In this talk, I define truth, discuss why it matters so much, take down common objections against the existence and knowability of truth, and then help students see the difference between subjective and objective claims.

Simply put, subjective claims are matters of personal opinion, such as which ice cream flavor you prefer. You can have your favorite (which is true for you) and I can have mine (which is true for me) because the basis of the claim is the subject, the person, believing something. Subjective claims are internal and thus depend only on the person who holds them.

Objective claims, on the other hand, are about the external world. People can have their own opinions about reality, but our beliefs don’t change it. Here are a few clear examples of objective claims:

  • 2 + 2 = 4 (math)
  • George Washington was the first president of the United States (history)
  • A water molecule is made up of 2 hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom (science)

Confusion Regarding Moral Truth

When I ask for answers from the audience, students rarely have trouble seeing these three claims as objective truths. But it all changes when I bring up an ethical issue, such as abortion. In fact, when I ask students whether the morality of abortion is subjective or objective, typically 70-90 percent of Christian kids will say that it is subjective, like choosing an ice cream flavor. I have done this with other moral issues and the response is typically the same. What does this tell us?

When I ask students whether the morality of abortion is subjective or objective, typically 70-90 percent of Christian kids will say that it is subjective, like choosing an ice cream flavor.

For one, it tells us that our kids have been deeply influenced by our culture. Students have imbibed the theory that it’s always wrong to judge, and are reluctant to tell others that they are wrong about moral issues. They have no problem making judgments about issues of math and science, but when it comes to morality, it’s all a matter of preference.

But with this said, I don’t believe students are actually relativists. In fact, I never believe someone who tells me he or she is a relativist. Why not? As C.S. Lewis observed in Mere Christianity, no one is really a relativist. People may claim to be relativists, but their lives will betray them as they live out moral beliefs anyway. And further, the apostle Paul tells us that even people without the Law still know moral truth because it is written on their hearts (Rom. 2:14-16).

The Folly of Moral Relativism

While Christian students do believe in objective moral truth, their confused response about moral issues being subjective leads me to wonder how many young Christians today actually get the gospel. Do they really know what it means to sin against a Holy God (whose character is the basis of the moral law)? Christian young people are not relativists deep down, but I do wonder how many think about their faith as if they were.

We must keep sharing the gospel with students today. But let’s not assume they really grasp it just because they respond with the right words.

Think about what subjective morality would mean for the gospel: If morality is a matter of each person’s choice, then there is no moral law that applies to all. If there is no objective moral law, then there can be no sin. And if there is no sin, then there is no reason for Jesus to die as our savior. The gospel rests upon the reality of a real moral law, which we have all broken, and thus need to be redeemed (Rom 3:23). If morality is subjective, the Christian story crumbles.

We must keep sharing the gospel with students today. But let’s not assume they really grasp it just because they respond with the right words. Rather, let’s help them see how foolish moral relativism is, and clearly see the reality of the objective moral law that is written on their hearts and rooted in God’s character. When students grasp the objectivity of morality, then sin makes sense. And when they understand (and experience) the reality of their own sinfulness, they are in position to grasp God’s saving grace, which is the good news at the heart of the gospel.

Sean McDowell, Ph.D., is a professor of Christian Apologetics at Biola University, best-selling author, popular speaker, part-time high school teacher and the Resident Scholar for Summit Ministries, California. Follow him on Twitter: @sean_mcdowell and his blog:

Originally appeared at Republished with permission.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Gary

    The belief in subjective morality isn’t limited to young people. You see it in the comments here every day, when the article is about some moral issue. But, those who believe in subjective morality don’t believe all morality is subjective. They all believe that judging someone else is objectively immoral.

    • “They all believe that judging someone else is objectively immoral.”

      One quibble. They believe that others judging themselves or those they consider allies is immoral, but they are very quick to judge those “judgers” as “judgmental.”

      I am reminded of Tom Lehrer’s patter introducing his song “National Brotherhood Week.” “Now I realize that there are some people who do not love their fellow man and I HATE people like that.”

      Side note: Matthew 7:1 is possibly the most misused verse in the Bible. The misusers probably have never bothered to read Matthew 7:2-5.

  • Hannah

    It’s incredibly difficult to interact with people my age because you’re right, Sean – most *do* balk at the mere mention of using discernment (translation: “judging” someone). I was raised by very politically and religiously outspoken parents who taught me to research my claims and verify whatever I said. It’s stressful living in this world, but thankfully, I’m not here forever.

  • Stephen D

    People today often speak of conduct they think is wrong without saying so. Instead they say it is “inappropriate” or “something I would not do”. I think part of the reason for this subjectivism or relativism in ethics – a symptom perhaps of the post-modern society – is that people actually do not recognise an external moral guideline, such as the Ten Commandments. It is important for Christians to clearly understand that God, through the Bible, does claim absolute authority over their conduct – and over the conduct of non-believers, whether atheists or people of other religions. God has one law, which applies to all.

The Tiniest Casket
Jennifer Hartline
More from The Stream
Connect with Us