Christian Baker Fears Loss of ‘Everything’ Unless Supreme Court Upholds Right Not to Make Cakes for Gay Marriages

Jack Phillips smiles in his cake shop. Alliance Defending Freedom is defending Phillips' right to decline to create cakes that would violate his religious convictions, such as a same-sex wedding cake. The Supreme Court announced on June 26, 2017 that it will hear the case.

By Published on June 27, 2017

By deciding to hear the appeal of a Colorado baker, the Supreme Court could make its first ruling next year on whether government may coerce some Christians, Jews, and Muslims to use their creative gifts to celebrate same-sex marriage.

The high court announced Monday that it would review the case of baker Jack Phillips, who cites his Christian faith in declining to make custom cakes for same-sex weddings.

The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could be the first since its 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage to say whether bakers, photographers, florists, and others must be part of such celebrations through their creative expression.

Phillips, whose Masterpiece Cakeshop is in Lakewood, Colorado, stopped making all wedding cakes in 2014 rather than be compelled by the state to design and bake them for same-sex marriages — or be fined for not obeying.

State agency and court decisions said Phillips must make such cakes after a gay couple complained about him in July 2012.

“There’s just certain events, certain cakes I don’t make,” Phillips told The Daily Signal in a phone interview in August 2015. “That was one of them.”

He also won’t make cakes depicting witchcraft, ghosts, and demons or sexually suggestive images, Phillips said in the interview.

The Supreme Court previously delayed nine times on deciding to hear Phillips’ appeal in the case, first filed last July. But with the newest justice, Neil Gorsuch, settled into his seat to succeed the late Antonin Scalia, the high court announced Monday morning that it would do so in its next term, which begins in October.  

Phillips’ lawyers are asking the justices to rule on whether Colorado’s public accommodations law, by forcing Phillips to express himself in a way that violates his sincere Christian beliefs about marriage, violates the free speech or free exercise of religion clauses of the Constitution’s First Amendment.

Supporters of President Donald Trump’s nomination of Gorsuch to the Supreme Court had cited the judge’s sensitivity to religious liberty in cases that came before him on the Denver-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.

The Colorado Supreme Court had refused Phillips’ appeal in the case, Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

On Aug. 13, 2015, the Colorado Court of Appeals agreed with the state Civil Rights Commission that Masterpiece Cakeshop discriminated against two gay men, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, when Phillips declined in July 2012 to take the couple’s order for a cake to celebrate their earlier wedding in Massachusetts.

Another local bakery filled the wedding cake order for the two men.

But the Colorado chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union argued for Craig and Mullins that state law prohibits businesses open to the public from refusing a service based on factors that include race, sex, national origin, and sexual orientation.

Phillips recalled his original encounter with Craig and Mullins in the 2015 interview with The Daily Signal:

I said, ‘You know, I’ll make you a birthday cake, shower cake, I’ll sell you cookies and brownies, I just don’t do cakes for same-sex weddings.’

At which point they stomped out. One went out one door, the other went out the other door, swearing at me and flipping me off.

Phillips, 61, a Christian since the late 1970s, has maintained that creating cakes for same-sex marriages would go against his constitutionally protected belief that marriage is the sacred union of a man and a woman, as taught in the Bible.

Phillips told The Daily Signal in 2015 that he faced a loss of at least $100,000 a year after Colorado judges ruled that his Masterpiece Cakeshop must make wedding cakes for same-sex couples as well as opposite-sex couples.

Masterpiece Cakeshop, which opened in 1993, used to produce about 200 custom-made wedding cakes a year, at about $500 per cake, he said.

“What’s important is that I’m being obedient to Christ,” Phillips told The Daily Signal, adding:

He’s given me this business and if he were here, he wouldn’t make the cake. If he were my employee, I wouldn’t force him to make the cake and participate in it because it doesn’t honor God. The Bible calls it a sin.

Phillips’ lawyers with Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal aid group, describe him as a “cake artist” and argue that the First Amendment means the government can’t compel him to use his talents to express a message supporting gay marriage.

The organization tweeted Monday:

Phillips, who belongs to a church rooted in the Baptist tradition, has opted since March 2014 not to take any new orders for wedding cakes rather than be forced to create them for two men or two women.

“I fear that I will ultimately lose everything and be forced to close if the lower court’s decision is not reversed,” Phillips said in a statement released Monday by his attorneys, adding:

Regardless of your viewpoint about same-sex marriage, shouldn’t we all agree that the government shouldn’t force us to speak or act in a way that violates our deepest convictions?

Laws like the one in Colorado will result in kindhearted Americans being dragged before state commissions and courts and punished by the government for peacefully seeking to live and work consistent with their belief about marriage.

The couple who came into my shop that day five years ago are free to hold their beliefs about marriage; all I ask is that I be allowed the equal opportunity to keep mine.


The Colorado chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union continues to represent Craig and Mullins.

“The law is squarely on Dave and Charlie’s side, because when businesses are open to the public, they’re supposed to be open to everyone,” James Esseks, director of the ACLU’s LGBT Project, said in the chapter’s press release Monday. Esseks added:

While the right to one’s religious beliefs is fundamental, a license to discriminate is not. Same-sex couples like Dave and Charlie deserve to be treated with the same dignity and respect as anyone else, and we’re ready to take that fight all the way to the Supreme Court.

The ACLU quoted Mullins as saying: “This has always been about more than a cake. Businesses should not be allowed to violate the law and discriminate against us because of who we are and who we love.”

The ACLU chapter tweeted:

Phillips’ lawyers, who note that Masterpiece Cakeshop makes plenty of other baked goods for customers of all persuasions, see the case differently.

“Jack’s ability to make a living and run his family business shouldn’t be threatened simply because he exercised his artistic freedom,” Jeremy Tedesco, one of Phillips’ attorneys at Alliance Defending Freedom, said in a prepared statement Monday, adding:

Artists speak through their art, and when Jack creates custom wedding cakes, he is promoting and celebrating the couple’s wedding. Jack will gladly allow anyone to purchase any product he sells, but he simply can’t put his artistic talents to use on a custom cake for an event so at odds with his faith convictions.

Tedesco said the American Civil Liberties Union, which went to court to oppose Phillips as well as other creative Christians in Washington and Arizona, “would rather use the strong arm of government to eradicate from the public square people whose views differ from the government’s.”

After the Colorado appeals court ruling against Phillips, his two sisters and a brother-in-law launched an online fundraising effort, “Support Jack Phillips,” to help offset the bakery’s ongoing losses. Its home is Continue to Give, a Christian-oriented “crowdfunding” site.


Ken McIntyre, a 30-year veteran of national and local newspapers, serves as senior editor at The Daily Signal and The Heritage Foundation’s Marilyn and Fred Guardabassi Fellow in Media and Public Policy Studies. Send an email to Ken@KenMac55

Copyright 2017 The Daily Signal

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Gary

    If the court rules for the Christian, they will be invalidating all anti-discrimination laws, which are designed to force people together who don’t want to be together. I think that will be something the court will not want to do.

  • GPS Daddy

    How many people are going to be ruined financially because they do not provide a picture, or a cake, or some other device for a SSM? Clearly there is no shame in the LGTB movement. If a bake, let’s say a Mormon baker refused to bake a cake for my Christian marriage I would move on to the next baker. My feelings might be hurt but I would never take the Mormon baker to court. It takes a very vindictive person to do so.

    • I hate to tell you this but times are changing and so are the way people think. A business able to refuse service based on their religious beliefs, because it causes them distress, is so ridiculous. And sorry, Marriage is for those that fall in love, believe it or not, we gays are just like you heteros. I say mind ypur own business and take a long look at your own lives cause I’m sure no one is sin free!

      • GPS Daddy

        Jazshizi, you want me to mind my own business then the LGTB movement should do likewise. But they have not. The LGTB movement is trying to make everyone tote their line… either bow to them or you will suffer loss. So you need to start with yourself on this.

        If a business sufferes loss because they refuse business then that is their choice.

        The traditional view of marriage is still the dominant view. What lowes has the LGTB movement sunk too to destroy people’s life because they will not conform? This is a VERY sad commentary on this movement.

        Take for example the 70 year old florist in Washington state. She showed friendship to a gay man who frequented her store. She sold him flowers. But she drew the line at a wedding based on her closely held religious beliefs. This gay man pressed a lawsuit that is going to destroy her financially.

        What darkness is in the soul of the LGTB movement to do such a thing?

      • DCM7

        “Marriage is for those that fall in love”
        Marriage for those willing to meet the conditions that it naturally comes with, have the will to live up to its demands, and have the strength of character to make it both functional and beneficial. The exclusive joining of man and woman is uniquely challenging, and meant to be so. Any attempt to enjoy the benefits of marriage, while rejecting its requirements and its value, can only produce a mere counterfeit.

        “believe it or not, we gays are just like you heteros”
        Only to the extent that many “heteros” also use sexuality to try to meet needs it was never designed to meet. Real marriage requires a person to turn away from this, not continue to be surrendered to it.

      • Gary

        Your perspective on everything is like your perspective on sex: perverted. That’s one of the reasons God told Moses to execute those who engage in homosexuality.

  • Gary

    Phillips could have kept himself out of this situation by disguising, or hiding his reasons for not filling the order of the homosexuals. Since he was aware, or should have been, that the state he lived in would prosecute him for refusing to do business with homosexuals, he had plenty of time to devise a plan for this situation. Instead, he chose to put himself at risk. I suppose he hoped the issue would never come up, but that was naïve. Or maybe he hoped that the government really would not prosecute him. That was naïve too. Those who support homosexuals have a genuine hatred for those who don’t and they will attack them if they can.

How Do I Handle My Regrets?
Joe Dallas
More from The Stream
Connect with Us