Eager for Better Branding, Assisted Suicide Supporters Can’t Agree on What to Call It
Legalization of physician-assisted suicide in four American states left out one thing: a name for what happens. The laws in Oregon, Washington, Vermont and California specify only that what happens is not suicide. An English name for this phenomenon was a topic raised at the 2016 Conference World Federation of Right-to-Die Societies in Amsterdam earlier this month.
Members of the Alt-Suicide group, an American-based internet forum which includes some of the leading names in “choosing an early exit at the end of life,” considered 31 words and phrases in 2014. These included Cathartic Death, Deliberate Life Completion, Exiting, Rational Life Termination, Non Adscititious [sic] Death, Consensual Murder, and Rational and Loving Suicide. “Dying with Dignity” was the favorite in a small survey.
The analysis he presented at the conference is interesting. The movement needs, he contends, “a more positive, single word that is not burdened with negative connotation.” The members agreed that the word “suicide” should be taboo. The word should be short so that it is easy to tweet. The task is, he says, to “replace an undesirable single word with a desirable single word.” Simmons concludes with a suggested slogan: “Our motto is: ‘Dignicide. You Decide.’”
No conclusion was reached about what word to use.
Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet. This article has been republished from BioEdge.
Originally published at MercatorNet and republished with permission.