A More Positive Take on the Awan Plea Deal

In this screengrab from a video, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., questions U.S. Capital Police Chief Matthew Verderosa about a laptop, confiscated for its ties to Imran Awan, during a hearing on the U.S. Capital Police Budget.

By Mike Huckabee Published on July 11, 2018

The news of Imran Awan’s sweetheart plea deal emerged quietly during Fourth of July week, but it hasn’t gone unnoticed here, even with the predominant story right now being President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. My initial thought about the Awan deal was, “Oh, man, the DOJ has buried another scandal,” and many readers agreed, some commenting they were disgusted and even literally sickened by the outcome.

Awan was allowed to plead guilty to one measly charge of bank fraud when he could have been charged with much more: espionage, perhaps, or theft of government property, just for starters.

But one response offered an interesting take. Mind you, it involves giving Jeff Sessions the benefit of the doubt and picturing him as working steadfastly behind the scenes to ensure that justice is eventually done. Not easy, I know; it’s like being the kid who gets a pile of manure at Christmas and just KNOWS there has to be pony in there somewhere! But for the moment, let’s try to do that and take the ride with reader Bonnie Robinson.

“When you want to catch a fish, you use a smaller fish,” she reminds us. Of course, we already knew that’s been the strategy behind the treatment of Paul Manafort — were you aware he’s spending 23 out of every 24 hours in solitary confinement before he’s been tried, even though the only charge against him is unrelated to the “Russia” investigation and goes back many years? — to get cooperation against President Trump, but it applies here as well.

Awan was allowed to plead guilty to one measly charge of bank fraud when he could have been charged with much more: espionage, perhaps, or theft of government property, just for starters. I would note that he’s also alleged to have attempted to evade justice by hopping a plane to Pakistan. Robinson points out that since plea deals come as part of an agreement to cooperate with investigators, Awan has likely provided them with information relating to the Democrats who hired him. If she’s right, that means that for a deal as sweet as the one he got, he’s likely been singing like Pavarotti.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

But Robinson goes on to address another aspect of this case: namely, how unlikely it is that an objective grand jury could be empaneled in Washington, D.C., for a case against congressional Democrats charged with something as serious as (perhaps) treason. The same would go for prosecutors and judges assigned to such a case. She reminds us that with all the evidence against the FBI presented in the IG report, the Inspector General left out that same part: the prosecution part. “Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?” she asks.

So, if it’s not going to be handled in D.C., where WILL it be handled? Robinson suggests that it’s moving from D.C. to Utah, under U.S. Attorney John Huber, who was selected by Attorney General Sessions to handle cases related to the IG report. Remarkably, Huber operates with a staff of 470 investigators, far exceeding the investigative power of a special counsel. One other possibility, if the cases relating to Awan include allegations of treason or other matters of national security, is that they will be tried in a military court, away from the media and the chance of compromising sensitive information, sources or methods. That lessens the likelihood that any “big fish” will get away on a technicality.

“Rest assured,” Robinson concludes, “this entire case is being handled with the utmost care.”

It’s hard to have confidence in that, especially when we’ve watched certain people skate for so long, but let’s hope she’s right. Sessions’ decision to call upon John Huber to team up with the IG and conduct a full-fledged criminal investigation in Utah, in the clean mountain air far from the stinky D.C. swamp, may turn out to be every bit as brilliant as top legal expert Jonathan Turley said it was in March.

 

Originally published at MikeHuckabee.com, and reprinted with kind permission.

Print Friendly
Comments ()
The Stream encourages comments, whether in agreement with the article or not. However, comments that violate our commenting rules or terms of use will be removed. Any commenter who repeatedly violates these rules and terms of use will be blocked from commenting. Comments on The Stream are hosted by Disqus, with logins available through Disqus, Facebook, Twitter or G+ accounts. You must log in to comment. Please flag any comments you see breaking the rules. More detail is available here.
  • Edward Bonderenka

    Free Jeff Sessions!

  • KC

    Thank you Mr Huckabee, I enjoy your writing.

  • Chip Crawford

    It seems a very thin line to hold …

  • Paul

    Can we tag this article as wishful thinking?

  • fiveHats

    it takes a lot of effort to continue to give Jeff Sessions ANY credit that ANYTHING will be done if it regards Democrats, Clinton or Obama, like it takes stupidity to ignore all that Sessions has done to give his position over to Rosenstein.

  • Nobody Specific

    Hard to buy this Mike, for all the same reasons its hard to take the Muller has been allowed to run this long. I look at it like this if there was any really evidence Muller was going to find of “high crimes” the necessity of doing something about an illegitimate president would have motivated any honest council to show his hand by now; so congress could act. Muller has not done that but has now spend so long he has to invent something to not make himself and half the FBI appear stupid and incapable.

    Same thing here – they are letting this guy off because either they A) know they can’t prosecute him because they have done something incompetent, mishandled evidence, screwed up chain of custody, violated some 4th Amendment protection etc, and he would walk or B) the DNC owns the investigating agents and the prosecutors office.

Inspiration
‘How Small a Whisper We Hear of Him’
Tom Gilson
More from The Stream
Connect with Us